# of Hands?

DoubleupDinan · #1 11-15-2004, 02:00 PM

Using PokerTracker what would you say is a good amount of hands before you can get an accurate reading on your BB/100? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

ErrantNight · #2 11-15-2004, 02:03 PM

use the search function. find the answer. been discussed innumerous times... including earlier today.

DoubleupDinan · #3 11-15-2004, 02:05 PM

ok cool, sorry i was a little new to the site.
Thanks

asofel · #4 11-15-2004, 02:04 PM

*dons flame retardant gear in preparation for upcoming responses*

Tosh · #5 11-15-2004, 02:08 PM

According to the forum's opinion, 75k-125k. See here.

DoubleupDinan · #6 11-15-2004, 02:18 PM

Thanks Tosh!
[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Octopus · #7 11-15-2004, 02:24 PM

Many of us are improving (or changing limits) faster than this statistic converges. You may never really "know" this number.

maynard · #8 11-15-2004, 02:29 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Using PokerTracker what would you say is a good amount of hands before you can get an accurate reading on your BB/100? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Would the answer change if you were using something other than PokerTracker to calculate BB/100? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] (I think it's safe to ignore Heisenberg's uncertainty principle here...)