#1
|
|||
|
|||
WPT Poker Corner: The Matt Matros A5 hand & Game Theory
Matros apparently wrote a book on Game Theory & Poker...
In the hand he went out on: 3-Handed Chip Counts: deKnijff $10.5mm Habib: $4.1mm Matros: $2.5mm Blinds 80k/160k Ante: $15k Matros had the button and first to act: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Bets $500k Habib mucks deKnjiff Calls with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Pot $1,125,000 Flop: 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Check Check Turn: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] deKnijffe bets $500k Matros moves all-in deKnijffe calls River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ---------------- On WPT Poker Corner, Dan Negeanu called this a donkey-play as he should not have put one more chip into this pot. He left himself with 3 outs on an all-in... WPT had just run a little vignette about how Matros used game theory. So clearly, it looked like Matros was using the 9 as a bluff card given that he thought it was unlikely that deKnijffe had enough to call him.... Donkey play or proper game theory play and just unlucky??? |
|
|