![]() |
|
View Poll Results: >= 48 | |||
0.5/1 Limit Hold'em or lower |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 33.33% |
1/2 Limit Hold'em |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
2/4 Limit Hold'em |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
3/6 Limit Hold'em |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
5/10 Limit Hold'em |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 33.33% |
10/20 Limit Hold'em |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 33.33% |
15/30 Limit Hold'em |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
30/60 Limit Hold'em or higher |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious how 2+2'ers tend to buy-in to larger ($200+) online tournaments.
-Z |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting results so far... I initially went the subqual route, but that's a lot of work, and I found I could fund my qualifiers easily enough with my SnG and ring game winnings. Hopefully, my play will eventually be up to skipping the qualifiers, too. Not there yet, though.
-Z |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bump
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During x-mas break, I was def. using my sng profits to play the multi bills. Now, Im just using the previous multi payouts to directly buy in.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should clarify that I'm asking specifically about "large" buy-ins to multi-table tournaments (thus the chosen forum), not $200 SNGs or $1000 Step tourneys.
Also, for the sake of this question, $200 should be dropped to $150 to include Party's weekday Supers. Finally, I didn't include "superqualifiers" (e.g. $8+1 multitable where a certain portion of top finishers advance straight to the tournament) as a choice. Though "subqualifiers" (e.g. $8+1 single table to win a seat at a $24+2 single table qualifier) are a different animal, we'll lump them together for the sake of this poll, as they are the cheapest but longest roads into the tournament. BTW, even though I can "afford" to buy-in directly now, I still play single table qualifiers. They're soft, don't take too long, and kind of get me warmed up for the MTT. -Z |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since playing qualifiers is the most popular method you could further subdivide into Single Table Qualifiers and Multi Table Qualifiers. I seem to have more success in the latter.
|
![]() |
|
|