#1
|
|||
|
|||
Better Sat structure
Ok so I am going to be playing in a satellite for a large land based tourney. I have two options due to a limited bankroll.
a) play a $30+$3 tourney which 1:10 get to a $300 final that 1:29 goes to the land based. or... b) play a $50+$5 where approx 1:150 go to the land based (usually some overlay) Now pure math say b. However, does the fact that I could limp into a seat in the $300 make it more worthwhile, and doesn't the likely decline in player talent in the $30 sub-sat make that more lucrative? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better Sat structure
Well I answered my own question, played in a 20pound Sat and there was only 21 entrants, 2 spots to the 200pound super sat and I won it all.
|
|
|