|
View Poll Results: sook threshold | |||
200BB's | 11 | 20.75% | |
250BB's | 12 | 22.64% | |
300BB's | 20 | 37.74% | |
300BB's + rent | 10 | 18.87% | |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2+2 noob percentage.
Of the 1000's of 2+2ers who post fairly often (more than 10 posts i guess) what % do you think are complete idiots?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
The number I used to think plus one divided by x, where x is the number of people who post on 2+2.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
got it
ty for the noob designation |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
These numbers seem a bit low, dont you think? Well, if a complete idiot were to take the poll, they would screw that up too. Sigh....
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
wait!
i thought noob was good? oye |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
The 2 people who chose 1% fall into the complete idiot catagory.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
Actually, the way the choices are set up, the bottom category is not 1%, it's anything 10% or less (since the next higher category is "more than 10%"). Actually I think 1 out of 10 is about right, since "complete" idiot is pretty severe. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
Maybe i should have worded it a tad differrently. I still think 1/10 is still too low, even for "complete idiots".
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
I wont vote in this stupid poll, but if it makes you feel any better I rank you among the complete idiots.
ps. your name sucks, are you 12? and that avitar is very gay, do you like sucking diek? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 noob percentage.
[ QUOTE ]
ps. your name sucks, are you 12? and that avitar is very gay, do you like sucking diek? [/ QUOTE ] You sound younger. Jerkface |
|
|