#1
|
|||
|
|||
Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
Are these things just card catching luck fests since the blinds are 75/150 by the time 20 hands have been dealt?
Thoughts, opinions. Discuss! I used to play them but then learned to despise them. I don't understand why I ever liked the 18 person ones. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
i used to play them a lot. i dotn think the blinds were a huge amount different a party style system where the blinds raise every ten hands.
it will be faster at the start, but as players get fewer, it will probably be a slower system (you can get through much more than ten hands in 5 min when 4/5 handed). now ive started playing in a format where the blinds go up every 5 hands, now that is manic. but i still think it can be broken (ive shown short term positive return). for further info, you can search the forum, its been covered a few times. but thats my opinion. Phill |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
[ QUOTE ]
Are these things just card catching luck fests since the blinds are 75/150 by the time 20 hands have been dealt? [/ QUOTE ] Not exactly, they are good fun and definitely as beatable as party sngs, players are tighter than party players (at low levels where i play). I just avoid getting involved early unless i have a good hand or a possiblity to take a huge pot down (PPs for set value), and later being very aggresive with hands like 99-QQ and AK AQ works well, you often get action from worse hands, and if you don't the blinds can be a good consolation as they get very large. Regards Mack |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
I think the 1-table is ok and have done quite well but agree the two table is a no-no for me, blinds get far too high if you don't hit cards early and there's absolutely no room to play.
They appeal when I've less time for the >1.25 hour ordinary SnG's on stars (and I'm crap at multitabling) stoneii |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
They are most definately beatable.
I spend most of my time at the moment at the $55+5 with the odd $105+9. To be honest I prefer the structure of the standard ones more but my results fell when they opened these. After quite a bit of analysis I decided that a lot of teh people I would like to play against had moved to the turbos..... My roi is now the same on the turbos as it was on the standard 50's but I can get twice as many in per hour.... UKgazz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
.....and my roi on the non-turbos went up as i no longer play against ukgazz since he became a turbo whore.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
The PS turbos are better than the PP games - the amount of time they take is about the same, but the luck/skill ratio is better, because you're starting off with almost twice as many chips.
Plus, the maniacs/LAGS are making a bigger mistake by going all-in early, since the blinds/stack ratio is smaller - and there are fewer of them there (perhaps as a result). And the "playing zone" lasts longer, IMO - the time after the blinds become worth playing for, but before it becomes a total crapshoot. Finally, the PS turbos are cheaper than the PP games. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
lol I did see you venturing to the dark side of the turbos once [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Opinion of Turbo SNG\'s on Pstars?
The sum up my venturing back into a (very very low limit!) turbo last night.. I saw many MANY hands of ace/6 os against the dreaded... ace/8 os! And I laughed my way into first place.
Maybe I'll give them a try now that I feel myself a better disciplined and more aggressive player. Thanks guys. |
|
|