Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2005, 10:41 PM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

Hey guys,

All of the hands I have in my currently active PokerTracker database are from 6max games.

However, I'm thinking of dabbling a bit in full ring games again.

For those of you who play both, how do you keep your stats seperate?? I don't want PokerTracker/Playerview to mix the stats together. (i.e. When I'm playing 6max, I don't want a players 10-player stats to be skewed by previously played full ring game stats ... and vice versa.)


Do you have to keep seperate databases or what? Or is there some way to have PlayerView filter only 6max vs Ring game stats.... (Note: I believe PlayerView will filter each stats from each limit, but can it distinguish 10/20 full from 10/20 6max).


[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]


Adam
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2005, 10:46 PM
kross kross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 105
Default Re: PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

I keep mine in one big (PostgreSQL) database. When reviewing stats in PT, you can set filters to display just one game level. PT considers 3/6 6-max a different game level than 3/6 full.

As far as I know, all of the HUDs have a way to filter the displayed stats to be for the current game level only. I know GameTime+ does. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

-- Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2005, 10:58 PM
imported_leader imported_leader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 510
Default Re: PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

[ QUOTE ]
I keep mine in one big (PostgreSQL) database.

[/ QUOTE ]

How hard is that to do? Converting to PostgreSQL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-11-2005, 12:18 AM
kross kross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 105
Default Re: PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

It's easy to do. Probably the hardest part, which isn't hard, is installing PostgreSQL. Converting is easy, it's just a menu option in PT.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2005, 10:46 PM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

I don't think you have to worry much, because most players who play short handed don't play full ring and vice versa. Ocasionally you may get some guys stats from SH that you think is for full ring, but I don't think this happens often.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2005, 12:23 AM
sy_or_bust sy_or_bust is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 169
Default Re: PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you have to worry much, because most players who play short handed don't play full ring and vice versa.

[/ QUOTE ]

This really isn't true in my experience. Especially for good players. I'd be careful. I actively play both, and I've picked up on many others that do also.

If you use PokerAce, you can filter stats for any #-handed game. I use 7-10, 4-6, and 2-3, so shorthanded numbers are never confused and I can mix limits. I've never touched my database.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2005, 12:28 AM
dave44 dave44 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: PokerTracker: 6max vs Full Ring databases??

I just have separate databases and thats worked fine for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.