How about a micro discussion on 6 max aggression factors?

[shadow29]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My post-sabattical stats:

Flop: 3.70
Turn: 2.56
River: 2.07
Total: 2.95

[/ QUOTE ]
It seems like your flop aggression is too high (even for the standards on this forum).

[/ QUOTE ]
A lot of the posters on this forum are weak/tight.

[/ QUOTE ]
bump

a HUSH downswing thread where aggression factors are discussed.

many very good players agree that your flop aggression factor is too high.

[/ QUOTE ]

Huge difference between 3.76/3.40/2.19 for a total of 3.20 and my stats. Huge huge difference. His aggro factors for later streets reveal what kind of aggression he's putting in on the flop. Look beyond the discrete numbers and at the bigger picture. I've talked with several top posters re: aggression factors, because I do hear a lot about how I play too aggressively. (I'd rather not say their names, but you would immediately recognize the handles). But what many have told me is that the strategy preached on these boards is not nearly aggressive enough. Of course, there is such a thing as being too aggressive. I think that I was too aggressive about eight months ago, when I had total AF of >3.0. But I think that there is a big difference in play between AG(tot) of 2.2 and AG(tot) of 2.7-2.9. And I think that that strategy is more optimal.

Peace.