|
|
#12
03-28-2005, 01:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Trying to apply SSH concepts at Party 1/2. AJo in middle position.
no content here, but do keep posting questions to firm up what you're reading!
it's like blackjack: counting cards improves your chances, but counting cards wrong is worse than not counting at all. 
|
|
#13
03-28-2005, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Trying to apply SSH concepts at Party 1/2. AJo in middle position.
[ QUOTE ]
This is a very very standard and easy muck, why did you push this hand so hard? [/ QUOTE ] As I said in my original post, I'm having a bit of trouble adjusting to the "don't fold in large pots" concept of SSH. I guess the key words (which is missing from my quote) is "decent hands" which another poster was kind enough to point out. Thanks for the help guys, I appreciate it!
|
|
#14
03-28-2005, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Trying to apply SSH concepts at Party 1/2. AJo in middle position.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] River: (9.50 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, Hero folds. This might be the big mistake in the pot. Folding for just one bet on the river. [/ QUOTE ] If you think this was your biggest mistake, you need some adjustments in your thinking. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. This is a clear misapplication of not folding the river for 1 bet. In this case, you don't have a hand. You don't even have a bluff catcher. Why call?
|
|
#15
03-28-2005, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Trying to apply SSH concepts at Party 1/2. AJo in middle position.
Yes! Pop'n on these forums. Never thought I'd see the day.
|
|
#16
03-28-2005, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Trying to apply SSH concepts at Party 1/2. AJo in middle position.
I always feel really weak folding these flops in the situation but it's the right play, think about it, what card can you catch on the turn to give you a winning hand?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
