|
|
#11
06-07-2005, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
[ QUOTE ]
Why would Party do anything to jeopardize their cash cow? It begs the question, "If you had a 14 inch dick, would you cut it in half?" [/ QUOTE ] Why not? Then you could screw two girls at the same time and satisfy them both rather then having to go easy on only one. /devil's advocate //ashamed at having posted that 
|
|
#12
06-07-2005, 11:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
Who cares if it's rigged, It's giving me sh*tloads of money, are you saying that it could give me even more? I don't see your fascination with proving that online poker is any different than playing live.
|
|
#13
06-07-2005, 11:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
[ QUOTE ]
It would be an incredibly complicated code to assemble. [/ QUOTE ] No it wouldn't be. Really, it wouldn't be. It is just a simple branch to utilize a "picking" routine rather than the standard randomization. Really, coding isn't that hard for people that code for a living. [ QUOTE ] And yes, we would be able to detect it. [/ QUOTE ] No, I don't think individuals would. It surely could be done in a manner that would require many millions of hands to be compared and analyzed together in order to show any deviation from standard expectations. Think of how many hands you would have to have to show that even the first two cards are dealt within standard expectations. Math guys?
|
|
#14
06-07-2005, 11:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
A better example would be, if you had a 14 inch dick, would you inject it with AIDS because it would make it grow another half inch?
|
|
#15
06-07-2005, 11:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
[ QUOTE ]
Why not? Then you could screw two girls at the same time and satisfy them both rather then having to go easy on only one. /devil's advocate //ashamed at having posted that [/ QUOTE ] Oh boy, so naive when they're young aren't they? 1)Who cares about satisfying the woman? 2)Who goes "easy"? Someone's been watching too many Disney movies...
|
|
#16
06-08-2005, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And yes, we would be able to detect it. [/ QUOTE ] No, I don't think individuals would. It surely could be done in a manner that would require many millions of hands to be compared and analyzed together in order to show any deviation from standard expectations. Think of how many hands you would have to have to show that even the first two cards are dealt within standard expectations. Math guys? [/ QUOTE ] It's already been done. Cards are random.
|
|
#17
06-08-2005, 12:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
Could you please elaborate on this preliminary data?
I'm very curious. This evening, I had a full house busted by a runner runner str8 flush. It was not the first time. It was like they knew because they kept raising, too. It got me thinking not about things being rigged, but possibly hacked.... I will probably post more of my thoughts about this in my own thread once I get them sorted.... The 10K+ hand losing streaks do seem to happen quite a bit. X
|
|
#18
06-08-2005, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
[ QUOTE ]
A better example would be, if you had a 14 inch dick, would you inject it with AIDS because it would make it grow another half inch? [/ QUOTE ] awesome.
|
|
#20
06-08-2005, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pure Tin Foil Hat Stuff - U wuz warned
[ QUOTE ]
It's already been done. Cards are random. [/ QUOTE ] See, here is the funny thing -- it really hasn't been done. Read closely what the auditors examined. You will notice that there has been zero examination of the system at random testing intervals. Only an examination of prepared and supplied data sets. This is not the same, do you see why?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
