#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-Table 3/6 Extremely Tight = 100k/year? (low content)
I would rather shoot myself in the head than 8-table $3/6 for 41 hours per week.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-Table 3/6 Extremely Tight = 100k/year? (low content)
This is exactly why I 41-table the 3/6 for 8 hours a week.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-Table 3/6 Extremely Tight = 100k/year? (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
Playing like this will not improve your game. Also the games will get tougher over time and your profits will slowly drop. So I reccomend working on your game and improving to higher limits than "farming" a low limit game for a long period of time. [/ QUOTE ] First of all, he wants to make money, not improve his game. Second, there is no way of telling whether online games will be tougher or not in the future. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-Table 3/6 Extremely Tight = 100k/year? (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
"If I 8-table at 3/6 and literally only play AA-77 + AK + AQs, AJs, KQs...through about 11,000 hands, I'm up about 1.75 BB/100. " I seriously doubt this is a long term winning strategy. Even if it is you could do much better. [/ QUOTE ] Of course it's a winning strategy, if the games are soft enough. If by doing better, you mean playing more hands, you must consider that he's playing eight tables. If hero has time to play more hands, he should be adding tables, not play looser. |
|
|