|
|
|
|
#1
05-11-2005, 05:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
fight the battle of who could care less
4-handed 50/100
folded to me in the SB with AA, i raise to $300, mike matusow in the BB re-raises to $900. noteworthy is the fact that matusow is stuck and possibly drunk and this is will be a fairly liberal range here. i call. flop Kc Kd 5h. checked around. turn Kc Kd 5h Ks. checked around. river Kc Kd 5h Ks 4h. i check. he bets $1800. i check-raise all-in for $12,000 which has him covered. 
|
|
#2
05-11-2005, 05:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
Wow, I luv this move, there are only 2 things this can result in.
1 He calls with a 4 or a 5 or a pp. 2 He folds and goes on super monkey tilt, thinking that you are pushing out of hands with nothing and tries to bully u around from here on, resulting in u getting paid off
|
|
#3
05-11-2005, 05:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
I saw the hand so I'm not going to comment, just leave these thoughts. IF he managed to check a K twice, he's earned my money. Checking aces three times like this is pretty damn ballsy though.
|
|
#4
05-11-2005, 06:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
Does this guy ever win? All I ever hear about is dillpickle or whatever his name is losing his whole stack....
|
|
#5
05-11-2005, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
[ QUOTE ]
I saw the hand so I'm not going to comment, just leave these thoughts. IF he managed to check a K twice, he's earned my money. Checking aces three times like this is pretty damn ballsy though. [/ QUOTE ]managed to check a K twice? big deal... people check a K twice maybe more often than the bet the thing... rephrase to "if he managed to make the nut hand when i made the second nut hand when we are playing four handed and i have reason to believe he is tilting or playing poorly, and we have relatively shallow stacks, then he will just have to double through.." then i completely agree. as for hero play... i think he played it like a champ, but i would checkraise to only 4k on the river... that overbet is looking HUGE to me if im villain... i might even lasy down the other AA.
|
|
#7
05-11-2005, 04:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i might even lasy down the other AA. [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't that be a good thing? [/ QUOTE ]i was just making a point... of course, hypothetically, that would be sick.
|
|
#8
05-11-2005, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
so if matusow was villian, what do you think he pulls this move with? Since he's liable to project what hands he'd do this with, and his taunting of another player at the time of not having balls...
|
|
#9
05-11-2005, 06:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
You played this hand really really weird.
I can't see myself checking here three times. On one street I'd try to get $$ in. If he has a K he gets my money.
|
|
#10
05-11-2005, 07:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fight the battle of who could care less
[ QUOTE ]
4-handed 50/100 folded to me in the SB with AA, i raise to $300, mike matusow in the BB re-raises to $900. noteworthy is the fact that matusow is stuck and possibly drunk and this is will be a fairly liberal range here. i call. flop Kc Kd 5h. checked around. turn Kc Kd 5h Ks. checked around. river Kc Kd 5h Ks 4h. i check. he bets $1800. i check-raise all-in for $12,000 which has him covered. [/ QUOTE ] Is the idea to get the stack now, or to get the stack later once he tilts after this hand?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
