Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2004, 09:51 AM
Packerfan1 Packerfan1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: WI
Posts: 157
Default Popularity of 6max at Party

I log on to Party monday morning to check out the tournament schedule. As my usual 10/20 lists come up, I count 18 6-max tables going and only 1 10-player table.

Now to me it breaks many standard laws of business common sense that Party has as many players (and unique players they are) as it does. But why would a "non-standard" semi-shorthanded game be 18 times more popular than the standard game?

Any thoughts?

Pack
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2004, 09:59 AM
imitation imitation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 560
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

ACTION ACTION ACTION
shhh people in the other forums might find out about these games
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2004, 10:57 AM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

people play the 15 full instead of the 10.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2004, 11:04 AM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

party earns more rake off the SH tables, as there are more of them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2004, 11:07 AM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 672
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

[ QUOTE ]
people play the 15 full instead of the 10.

[/ QUOTE ]

This brings up a question. Schneids says the 15/30 game has a lot of ringers in it, thus making table selection important and probably implying that the game is not very soft. I wonder how much softer the 10/20 full game is and if it is beatable for enough more BB/100 to make up for the lower limit. (I know this is HUSH, but I don't read the mid/high stakes forums often.)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2004, 11:12 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

I've never played the 10/20 or the 15/30 games, but I seem to remember a few people saying the 15/30 full game was very soft (i.e. bicyclekick).

Who's right?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2004, 11:29 AM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

El Diablo posted that the 15 full was more profitable somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2004, 12:11 PM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 672
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

El Diablo said the 15/30 full game was more profitable than the 10/20 short game. I am curious if the 10/20 full game is sufficiently softer than the 15/30 game to either a. make it more profitable (in terms of $) or b. less variable. If both, great; if just the latter (or the former), then the quesion "Under what utility functions does the 10/20 game become the more desirable one?" comes to mind.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2004, 12:17 PM
NoTalent NoTalent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

[ QUOTE ]
people play the 15 full instead of the 10.

[/ QUOTE ]
exactly

more hands/hour = more $$ for party
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2004, 12:19 PM
meow_meow meow_meow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 180
Default Re: Popularity of 6max at Party

I doubt if the full 10/20 is softer than the 15/30 at all. There may be a bunch of good players who play the 15-30, but there are plenty of morons too. Granted, it's a different kind of idiot than you find at the lower limits (more aggressive), but comparing it to the 5-10 6max (which I have the most experience with), I'd say the differences between the two in terms of average player skill are negligible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.