|
|
#1
06-29-2005, 03:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
6-table as opposed to full table
Any suggestions on the difference in what hands to play?
All comments appreciated. Considering Party just introduced 6-tables on 0,5/1 we will probably see loads of fish on those tables... 
|
|
#2
06-29-2005, 03:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 6-table as opposed to full table
[ QUOTE ]
Any suggestions on the difference in what hands to play? All comments appreciated. Considering Party just introduced 6-tables on 0,5/1 we will probably see loads of fish on those tables... [/ QUOTE ] At first i liked those tables and was up 30BB now i am down 60BB they are very tricky and u need to pay a lot fo attention and adjust very quickly
|
|
#4
06-29-2005, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 6-table as opposed to full table
i found a shorthanded preflop chart someone around the forums. find that because you play more-or-less completely different hands- by "different" i mean MORE. too many to really type out and explain.
all the babble summarized: search around for a shorthanded preflop chart.
|
|
#5
06-29-2005, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 6-table as opposed to full table
[ QUOTE ]
they are very tricky and u need to pay a lot fo attention [/ QUOTE ] you must have gotten some really bad tables, they were the typical superbad donks on the couple that I played
|
|
#6
06-29-2005, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 6-table as opposed to full table
There's a starting hand chart here that seems to generate a fair amount of agreement. If you go forward a couple of pages, you can find an excel version of a very similar chart that is easier to print.
Personally, I didn't find the consensus starting hand chart to be surprising at all. If you were in a full ring game and the first four players all folded, how would your hand evaluation change? If you understand the answer to that question, you're golden.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
