Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2005, 09:05 PM
bunky9590 bunky9590 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,188
Default 99 under fire against a solid

Villain is pretty solid, TAG and probably views me as solid albeit a little loose, but he knows im not a donk.

Line seem a little much?

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Bunky is MP with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Bunky raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.40 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Bunky bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Bunky calls.

Turn: (4.20 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Bunky raises</font>,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2005, 09:10 PM
billyjex billyjex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: whoring
Posts: 242
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

i don't think he's folding a J here, so I don't really like it much.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2005, 09:52 PM
wrto4556 wrto4556 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,280
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

I think it's fine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2005, 09:53 PM
wrto4556 wrto4556 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,280
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

[ QUOTE ]
i don't think he's folding a J here, so I don't really like it much.

[/ QUOTE ]

He could also have a flush draw or an under pair.

EDIT: He *could* fold a J. Because of the extra hands that he could have (besides a J), he doesn't have to fold a J very much to make raising correct, i think.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2005, 09:55 PM
exist exist is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 25
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

seems fine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2005, 10:05 PM
krishanleong krishanleong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

better than fine, this is great!

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-18-2005, 10:21 PM
tizim tizim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

I don't like it. You don't want him to fold a 3, a 2, or a lower PP, and a J is rarely folding.

Edit: Actually, I changed my mind. I didn't see the flush draw, and I miscalculated the pot size. I like it a lot [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-18-2005, 10:25 PM
krishanleong krishanleong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like it. You don't want him to fold a 3, a 2, or a lower PP, and a J is rarely folding.

[/ QUOTE ]

people love to say a j is rarely folding but if villian held t9 on the turn, and he posted the hand, everyone would tell him to bet/fold the turn.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-18-2005, 11:33 PM
SCfuji SCfuji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 467
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

if this guy knows you are solid it would seem retarded to check raise you with a flush draw so id have to give him at least a jack or a combo hand like JT of diamonds. i dont think this villain is going to fold here on the turn because he has a hand that could probably improve. if you want any chance of getting him off a better hand than yours its going to take a blankity blank river and another big bet yeah?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-18-2005, 11:36 PM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: 99 under fire against a solid

I dont see why it would be retarded to check-raise with a flushdraw here, explain ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.