Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   99 under fire against a solid (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=275789)

bunky9590 06-18-2005 09:05 PM

99 under fire against a solid
 
Villain is pretty solid, TAG and probably views me as solid albeit a little loose, but he knows im not a donk.

Line seem a little much?

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Bunky is MP with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Bunky raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.40 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Bunky bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Bunky calls.

Turn: (4.20 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Bunky raises</font>,

billyjex 06-18-2005 09:10 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
i don't think he's folding a J here, so I don't really like it much.

wrto4556 06-18-2005 09:52 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
I think it's fine.

wrto4556 06-18-2005 09:53 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
[ QUOTE ]
i don't think he's folding a J here, so I don't really like it much.

[/ QUOTE ]

He could also have a flush draw or an under pair.

EDIT: He *could* fold a J. Because of the extra hands that he could have (besides a J), he doesn't have to fold a J very much to make raising correct, i think.

exist 06-18-2005 09:55 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
seems fine.

krishanleong 06-18-2005 10:05 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
better than fine, this is great!

Krishan

tizim 06-18-2005 10:21 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
I don't like it. You don't want him to fold a 3, a 2, or a lower PP, and a J is rarely folding.

Edit: Actually, I changed my mind. I didn't see the flush draw, and I miscalculated the pot size. I like it a lot [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

krishanleong 06-18-2005 10:25 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like it. You don't want him to fold a 3, a 2, or a lower PP, and a J is rarely folding.

[/ QUOTE ]

people love to say a j is rarely folding but if villian held t9 on the turn, and he posted the hand, everyone would tell him to bet/fold the turn.

Krishan

SCfuji 06-18-2005 11:33 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
if this guy knows you are solid it would seem retarded to check raise you with a flush draw so id have to give him at least a jack or a combo hand like JT of diamonds. i dont think this villain is going to fold here on the turn because he has a hand that could probably improve. if you want any chance of getting him off a better hand than yours its going to take a blankity blank river and another big bet yeah?

Trix 06-18-2005 11:36 PM

Re: 99 under fire against a solid
 
I dont see why it would be retarded to check-raise with a flushdraw here, explain ?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.