Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:30 PM
Hojglad Hojglad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Call. So many people bet when checked to with total air that it's ridiculous. I agree with Aaron's sentiments here - you need to be checkraising this flop, not betting into a field of 8.4 billion.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't say check-raise. I just said check.

[/ QUOTE ]
I know - I didn't mean to imply that you did. Sorry about that. The check-raise is my preference here, so long as the bet comes from pretty much the CO or button.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:33 PM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

preflop is fine. raising is better, but it isn't worth getting worked up about. if it was KJo- different story.

i'm not betting that flop. check/call. i'll probably check/call that turn...maybe. basically if we're behind to a Q, the BEST case senario is noone has KQ or QJ, so at best we have 5 outs and need 9:1. with implied odds, it's borderline, but with the other 2 hands possible, either fold the turn or river isn't a big problem...IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:33 PM
Bodhi Bodhi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 425
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

"Butchering" does seem quite fair; as I said, it's a simplication that's merely trying to light up the main idea. It's also a lot easier to critique these presentations than to give them yourself, so if you think you can do better then be my guest.

Lastly, it's been a while since I've played .5/1, but getting 4-6 cold callers after an utg raise was very habitual for me.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:36 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

[ QUOTE ]
"Butchering" does seem quite fair; as I said, it's a simplication that's merely trying to light up the main idea. It's also a lot easier to critique these presentations than to give them yourself, so if you think you can do better then be my guest.

Lastly, it's been a while since I've played .5/1, but getting 4-6 cold callers after an utg raise was very habitual for me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I suspect you have selective memory. I think you should go through PT and filter out the hands where you raised UTG and start counting your cold-callers. Had you said 2-3, I would have believed you.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:45 PM
J. Stew J. Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

What's wrong with encouraging limpers with a hand that does well multi-way?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:51 PM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

KJs isn't "just" a multiway hand like 76s or 44. It's also a pretty good "top pair" hand.

So if you raise and a bunch of people coldcall, that's fine with you. If you raise and it gets HU, that's fine too. Basically, you're happy no matter how people respond to your raise*, which is one way of showing that a raise is good.

*Unless comes back to you capped. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-06-2005, 03:27 PM
BruinEric BruinEric is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 188
Default Re: Mercy call with sedond pair?

[ QUOTE ]

Lastly, it's been a while since I've played .5/1, but getting 4-6 cold callers after an utg raise was very habitual for me.

[/ QUOTE ]

FWIW, In the past month or so, I'm finding the TYPICAL Party table at .5/1 to be 30% to 35% VP$IP in USA evening hours.

Many tables drift toward 22% to 28%. It is not uncommon to be staying at a table with a VP$IP of 27% to 31% because there are two to three quite poor players. However, you are sharing the wealth with at least one or two 15/5 types and probably one 20/12 type.

Finding FULL RING tables at this limit that are 40% VP$IP or higher is not easy. Finding a game with 3+ known TAGs already seated is easier.

As for cold-calling raises, this comes & goes. Seeing 4-6 cold-calls of an UTG raise is at least equally likely to having only 0-1 callers.

My records show that on PARTY over the past month or so -- skewed to my play which is generally on THU/FRI/SAT/SUN evenings -- that the ASF is 36.39. For Empire the number is 36.42. This number is also skewed to my leaving tables that tighten and/or sitting with a few on my buddylist.

Trying to add helpful addl info.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.