Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-15-2005, 11:03 PM
ChrisW ChrisW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: All-in hand rankings for short stacks

[ QUOTE ]
Pushing [with 15 BBs] is
A) A lower variance play, which often is the better choice in tournamnets

[/ QUOTE ]

Uhh... no it's not? Variance is a measure of the the disbursement of results in a distribution. By definition, moving in has more variance associated with it.


[ QUOTE ]
B) Alright because w/ normal raises a normal continuation bet will put you into critical mode if you get raised. Not a fun situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

After raising, I'll have 12 BB left. I can make a probe bet of 3BB on the flop and still have enough to threaten other players if I'm forced out. Also, there's no rule that says I must always continuation-bet. I'd see your point more if I had 12 BB instead of 15.

[ QUOTE ]
C) Depending on the table, you'll get called by much worse hands. (i.e. you've stolen the blinds two hands ina row by pushing to get up to 15bb's, if you pick up QQ+/AK i'm pretty sure the best play would be to push again, you'll get called by a bunch of inferior hands that you dominate.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a specious argument. Of course you'll be happy if you pick up a big hand after the table views you as a LAG, but what if you pick up one of the (much more frequent) marginal raising hands? You might have to avoid rasing because you know that your opponents are likely to take a shot at you. When in middle position, I think most players would prefer a tight image to a loose one, even though the loose image could work out great if you pick up the right hand at the right time.

[ QUOTE ]
Try not to follow rules like 'Pushing w/ 15bb's is never correct' because they generally don't always work.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the best comment of all. How about the rule, 'pushing with 30 BB is never correct.' Does your free-thinking philosophy allow you to agree with that one? There's some line at which pushing (against competent opponents) becomes unprofitable. Perhaps I don't know enough about it to offer an opinion on the location of that line, although I do have a 44% ITM over a few thousand 109s and 215s. My opinion from that experience is that pushes from MP with over 12 BBs are -EV. Of course, one could push a touch more aggressively in a tournament with antes; I'd guess about 13.5 BBs would be the "point of EV no return" in that case. In addition, if I were pushing with a given stack size, I'd be pushing on all playable hands. The strategy of pushing with mediocre hands but raising with good hands will not be successful outside of the low limits IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-15-2005, 11:42 PM
Exitonly Exitonly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3
Default Re: All-in hand rankings for short stacks

alright for the variance comment i guess i don't know variance well enough to argue this, but a play that 65%+ of the time takes the pot uncontested seems like it would have lower variance. But i'll assume you know more than i do about that.


As for pushing w/ 15bb from BB.. it definitely is not always -EV, and i'd like to see your math that says a push with AJo is bad w/ 5 left to act, 2BB's in the pot. Same goes for 33, beccause unless there are 5 loose players left to act behind you, 33 from MP is a +EV push too.

As for the 30bb rule,yea i guess i'll agree that pushing w/ 30bb is probably never the best play.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-16-2005, 02:29 AM
tshak tshak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 41
Default Re: All-in hand rankings for short stacks

[ QUOTE ]
alright for the variance comment i guess i don't know variance well enough to argue this, but a play that 65%+ of the time takes the pot uncontested seems like it would have lower variance. But i'll assume you know more than i do about that.


As for pushing w/ 15bb from BB.. it definitely is not always -EV, and i'd like to see your math that says a push with AJo is bad w/ 5 left to act, 2BB's in the pot.


[/ QUOTE ]

Stack: 15K
SB/BB/Ante: 500/1000/125
Pot: 2750
Position: MP3
Players: 10
Hole Cards: AsJc

Avg. Calling Range: 77+,ATs+,KQs,ATo+,KQo
You will be called: 48.5%
Expectation: -1044

Fold: 51.5%
Expectation: 2750

Net Expectation: ~910

Someone please check my math - I'm pretty new at this.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-16-2005, 02:31 AM
Exitonly Exitonly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3
Default Re: All-in hand rankings for short stacks

calling range is too wide, but that's the general idea.. according to my spreadsheet i use to do the math for me.. AJo w/ 5 left to act 15 BB stack, should have an EV of about .8BB, AJS, 1.2 BB
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.