|
|
#22
07-05-2005, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Disappointed with PV.
[ QUOTE ]
Can someone please compare PV to PAHUD? I'm with PAHUD right now but would consider switching to PV if it's considerably better [/ QUOTE ] Don't. All PV's got is tourney support, compared to PAHUD. 
|
|
#23
07-05-2005, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
Gooooood little sheep
Looking back, I am sure Amir is kicking himself for not charging you idiots $200 Afterall, you make it right back right?
|
|
#24
07-05-2005, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
[ QUOTE ]
good post from someone who actually knows what he's talking about. [/ QUOTE ] Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
|
|
#25
07-05-2005, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
|
|
#26
07-05-2005, 07:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Can someone please compare PV to PAHUD? I'm with PAHUD right now but would consider switching to PV if it's considerably better [/ QUOTE ] Don't. All PV's got is tourney support, compared to PAHUD. [/ QUOTE ] PA Hud has tournament support now. Feature wise, Omaha is the only major feature PlayerView has that PokerAce Hud does not. PokerStars support will be available in the next release (hopefully out tomorrow). After that I will be adding support for the Crypto sites, then Omaha.
|
|
#27
07-05-2005, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
I'm using PlayerView with Stars. It's called "beta" but it works well. I think both programs have their little growing pains, so for that reason they could both be called "beta" - they're both certainly ready for prime time. I like them both. One is $50 and the other has not had its price stated yet.
|
|
#28
07-05-2005, 10:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
I've made about 35k using Player View playing about 10 hours a week, and PV has had more than a negligble positive effect on my play, so I'd say so.
|
|
#29
07-06-2005, 03:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
I was using gametime+ for a while before I switched to PV. I wanted to see the mucked hands ASAP to analyze opponents play -- not available in GT+ or Pokerace (at that time).
The downside was the tiny icons on my 1400x1050 laptop monitor, so I made some new cards here. If you're still using PV, give them a try. I think you'll like them. Although now that Pokerace has the mucked cards too, there are few reasons for anyone to choose PV over Pokerace. Nonetheless, I think PV was worth it while it lasted, and there's no need to taunt those who found PV useful in the past (or still use it for omaha, etc.) As for Pokerace, wow, I'm very impressed. I've been recommending your software over PV to my friends who are new to online poker. Great stuff!
|
|
#30
07-06-2005, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Disappointed with PV.
Oh do you mean Kaizen's cards? The ones that Amir put up? He originally suggested taking Party's 4-color deck cards and putting them in PV's image directory, then someone named Kaizen put up some great cards, actually a quarter of a card, very visible.
Have you used Ace's cards? I wonder about using Kaizen's cards in PokerAce. I've been using PV over at PokerStars so I don't remember but I think Ace had some good-looking cards.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
