Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-15-2005, 06:36 PM
W. Deranged W. Deranged is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 96
Default Re: a great draw

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...we're actually only "losing" a third of a BB on every bet that goes in on this street, and risking a third of a BB to steal BB's 2/3 of this 5 BB pot seems worthwhile to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get it. help?

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's assume we have 16 outs, which, for ease, is about 1/3 equity.

When we bet on the turn and get called, 1/3 of all the money that goes in on the turn comes back to us. That's 1/3 of 2 BB or 2/3 of a BB. So, for every 1 BB we put in on the turn, we get back 2/3 BB.

I like to think in terms of the "cost" or "real cost" of a turn bet, because I think a lot of people get too much into the "one big bet is one big bet" mode of thought and hence miss some important decisions. Betting on this turn is really not that risky because, even though we're usually behind when called, we are going to win so often.

The other part has to do with thinking about what part of the pot we are stealing. We are really only stealing the portion of the pot which the BB already has claim to. Since we already lay claim to 1/3 (that's our equity), we're really only stealing his 2/3 of the pot.

The point that emerges is that when we bet, we are not "risking 1 BB to take down 5 BB." We are really risking 1/3 BB (the effective cost of our bet) to take down 5(2/3) = 3 1/3 BB. Instead of getting 5-1 on our bluff attempt we're actually getting 10-1.

The extreme example here is when we actually have a very unlikely 50/50 draw on the turn. There, we should obviously bet every time because we are risking nothing to win the entire pot.

In other words, the effective odds we are getting on a turn semi-bluff are:

Q = P(1-x)/(1 - 2x)

Where P is pot size and x is our equity. In the neighborhood of 0 < x < .5, Q is an increasing, concave function of x where Q goes to infinity as x goes to .5.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-15-2005, 06:45 PM
callmedonnie callmedonnie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder Bitch
Posts: 96
Default Re: a great draw

I followed you and thought it was great all the way until the function at the end. There, I couldn't tell if you were just messing with me or not. That's what I get for get an English degree. Thanks, good stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-15-2005, 06:48 PM
W. Deranged W. Deranged is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 96
Default Re: a great draw

[ QUOTE ]
I followed you and thought it was great all the way until the function at the end. There, I couldn't tell if you were just messing with me or not. That's what I get for get an English degree. Thanks, good stuff.

[/ QUOTE ]

I mean, I'm getting a history degree...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-15-2005, 06:59 PM
callmedonnie callmedonnie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder Bitch
Posts: 96
Default Re: a great draw

lets just say i find functions unfunctionable.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-15-2005, 07:25 PM
hobbsmann hobbsmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 483
Default Re: a great draw

[ QUOTE ]

Q = P(1-x)/(1 - 2x)

Where P is pot size and x is our equity. In the neighborhood of 0 < x < .5, Q is an increasing, concave function of x where Q goes to infinity as x goes to .5.


[/ QUOTE ]


(Q-axis)
l''''''''''''''''''1
l''''''''''''''''''1
l''''''''''''''''''1
l'''''''''''''''''/
l''''''''''''''/
l''''''''''/
P---/
l
l
l----------- (x axis)
0 '' 0.2 ''0.5
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-15-2005, 08:28 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default fwiw

i bet and was called.

the river was a 7.

villain checked.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-15-2005, 08:30 PM
toss toss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 2+2 Archives Digging up Gold
Posts: 1,327
Default Re: fwiw

Another reason why I don't like betting the turn is that we'll have to invest two big bets should villain call the turn to win the pot. Plus I'm results oriented.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-15-2005, 08:35 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: fwiw

[ QUOTE ]
Another reason why I don't like betting the turn is that we'll have to invest two big bets should villain call the turn to win the pot. Plus I'm results oriented.

[/ QUOTE ]

me neither.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.