Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-07-2005, 11:53 PM
MN_Mime MN_Mime is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)

Glad to see you agree. I was thinking I was even more LAGgish than I imagined when people were calling it close [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-08-2005, 01:09 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning

Easy call no question, but what is the logic behind raising?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-08-2005, 01:37 AM
MN_Mime MN_Mime is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)

[ QUOTE ]
If UTG is solid though I fold hand #2 preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just re-read this and I'm wondering what range of hands you're putting a 'solid' UTG that cause you to fold this? There are very few hands that I'd expect a solid player to limp UTG, so I'd certainly be suspicious.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:06 AM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 205
Default Re: MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning

It might buy a card, and increases the possibility of winning if hero makes top pair with his ace.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:59 AM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If UTG is solid though I fold hand #2 preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just re-read this and I'm wondering what range of hands you're putting a 'solid' UTG that cause you to fold this? There are very few hands that I'd expect a solid player to limp UTG, so I'd certainly be suspicious.

[/ QUOTE ]

More passive TAGs limp hands like AJ and AT in early position, even AQ sometimes, and you're in a world of trouble
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:59 AM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning

[ QUOTE ]
It might buy a card, and increases the possibility of winning if hero makes top pair with his ace.

[/ QUOTE ]

The reason is actually the incredible amount of equity you have here.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-08-2005, 09:35 AM
MN_Mime MN_Mime is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It might buy a card, and increases the possibility of winning if hero makes top pair with his ace.

[/ QUOTE ]

The reason is actually the incredible amount of equity you have here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Baronzeus is right, but it's both IMO. After 30 billion simulations on Pokerstove...

Hand 1: 04.4775 % [ 00.04 00.00 ] { random }
Hand 2: 27.9693 % [ 00.26 00.02 ] { TT-88, A8s-A2s, QJs-Q2s, JTs-J2s, T9s-T8s, 98s, AQo-A2o, QJo-Q2o, JTo-J2o, T9o-T8o, 98o }
Hand 3: 28.2238 % [ 00.24 00.04 ] { AcTh }
Hand 4: 19.6626 % [ 00.17 00.02 ] { AA-TT, AKs-A2s, KQs-K2s, QJs-Q2s, JTs-J2s, T9s-T2s, 98s-92s, 87s-82s, 76s-72s, 65s-62s, 54s-52s, 43s-42s, 32s, AKo-ATo, KQo-KTo, QJo-QTo, JTo }
Hand 5: 19.6667 % [ 00.17 00.02 ] { AA-TT, AKs-A2s, KQs-K2s, QJs-Q2s, JTs-J2s, T9s-T2s, 98s-92s, 87s-82s, 76s-72s, 65s-62s, 54s-52s, 43s-42s, 32s, AKo-ATo, KQo-KTo, QJo-QTo, JTo }

I might be giving BB too much credit and the later limpers not enough credit with the lazy range of hands I assigned, but the idea is sound.

I also want to knock people out, because I want my Ace outs to be good and I don't want to chop with some random Ten if my bottom 4-straight hits.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:19 AM
Nilbud Nilbud is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 29
Default Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)

OK, I'm with you guys on calling, or even raising the double-gutter, but I can't see why you would call when it's only a gutshot. You've got about 5 good outs, but your only getting ~7:1 to call the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:29 AM
MATT111 MATT111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 173
Default Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)




Up to 12 outs. I`d discount to about 8 outs.
So the raise is for value if all the others call.
It might buy a free card too. But we often want to bet the turn anyway.

First hand is a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-08-2005, 10:36 AM
Nilbud Nilbud is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 29
Default Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)

Sorry, that wasn't worded very well. I was asking why they advocated calling with only a gutshot. Obviously this hand is a double-gutter, but I'm interested in why they would call a similar hand with a nut-straight gutshot and no double-gutter.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.