#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)
Glad to see you agree. I was thinking I was even more LAGgish than I imagined when people were calling it close [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning
Easy call no question, but what is the logic behind raising?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)
[ QUOTE ]
If UTG is solid though I fold hand #2 preflop. [/ QUOTE ] I just re-read this and I'm wondering what range of hands you're putting a 'solid' UTG that cause you to fold this? There are very few hands that I'd expect a solid player to limp UTG, so I'd certainly be suspicious. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning
It might buy a card, and increases the possibility of winning if hero makes top pair with his ace.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If UTG is solid though I fold hand #2 preflop. [/ QUOTE ] I just re-read this and I'm wondering what range of hands you're putting a 'solid' UTG that cause you to fold this? There are very few hands that I'd expect a solid player to limp UTG, so I'd certainly be suspicious. [/ QUOTE ] More passive TAGs limp hands like AJ and AT in early position, even AQ sometimes, and you're in a world of trouble |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning
[ QUOTE ]
It might buy a card, and increases the possibility of winning if hero makes top pair with his ace. [/ QUOTE ] The reason is actually the incredible amount of equity you have here. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MN_Mime/Baronzeus can you explain the reasoning
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It might buy a card, and increases the possibility of winning if hero makes top pair with his ace. [/ QUOTE ] The reason is actually the incredible amount of equity you have here. [/ QUOTE ] Baronzeus is right, but it's both IMO. After 30 billion simulations on Pokerstove... Hand 1: 04.4775 % [ 00.04 00.00 ] { random } Hand 2: 27.9693 % [ 00.26 00.02 ] { TT-88, A8s-A2s, QJs-Q2s, JTs-J2s, T9s-T8s, 98s, AQo-A2o, QJo-Q2o, JTo-J2o, T9o-T8o, 98o } Hand 3: 28.2238 % [ 00.24 00.04 ] { AcTh } Hand 4: 19.6626 % [ 00.17 00.02 ] { AA-TT, AKs-A2s, KQs-K2s, QJs-Q2s, JTs-J2s, T9s-T2s, 98s-92s, 87s-82s, 76s-72s, 65s-62s, 54s-52s, 43s-42s, 32s, AKo-ATo, KQo-KTo, QJo-QTo, JTo } Hand 5: 19.6667 % [ 00.17 00.02 ] { AA-TT, AKs-A2s, KQs-K2s, QJs-Q2s, JTs-J2s, T9s-T2s, 98s-92s, 87s-82s, 76s-72s, 65s-62s, 54s-52s, 43s-42s, 32s, AKo-ATo, KQo-KTo, QJo-QTo, JTo } I might be giving BB too much credit and the later limpers not enough credit with the lazy range of hands I assigned, but the idea is sound. I also want to knock people out, because I want my Ace outs to be good and I don't want to chop with some random Ten if my bottom 4-straight hits. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)
OK, I'm with you guys on calling, or even raising the double-gutter, but I can't see why you would call when it's only a gutshot. You've got about 5 good outs, but your only getting ~7:1 to call the flop.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)
Up to 12 outs. I`d discount to about 8 outs. So the raise is for value if all the others call. It might buy a free card too. But we often want to bet the turn anyway. First hand is a fold. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Review: Hands 89 & 90 (straight draws)
Sorry, that wasn't worded very well. I was asking why they advocated calling with only a gutshot. Obviously this hand is a double-gutter, but I'm interested in why they would call a similar hand with a nut-straight gutshot and no double-gutter.
|
|
|