|
|
#11
05-02-2005, 07:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results
"UTG was diamonds, QQ was the red queens."
I play too much online, I read this and thought 'that's okay, diamonds are blue'... wow BTW, when you guys quote, how do you put the quote in that smaller box within the post? 
|
|
#13
05-03-2005, 02:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Results
This has been discussed. A "misclick" can just as likely be a player trying to manipulate you into thinking he misclicked, actually sitting on AA. I think Richie Rich's analysis pretty much said it all.
That being said, the point about the caller trying to build his stack so that he can bully and LAG out is interesting, however wouldn't such a player typically be sitting with the max? Hmmm.... caller might want to rethink his strategy here.
|
|
#14
05-03-2005, 02:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Results
[ QUOTE ]
"UTG was diamonds, QQ was the red queens." I play too much online, I read this and thought 'that's okay, diamonds are blue'... [/ QUOTE ] When I am thinking over live hands that I've played/watched, I visualize everything using a four-color deck. This is especially true when I have a suited hand (I can still picture getting "red AA" but yet I have these weird pseudo-memories of things like green AcKc or blue AdKd).
|
|
#15
05-04-2005, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Results
He typically does, he just lost a pot on a recent hand and hadn't maxed back up, and also he loves making borderline calls to enhance his image as crazy which he isn't.
|
|
#16
05-04-2005, 03:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I missing something here?
First question... how big are the blinds??? You only say $.
Second question... UTG goes all-in for $1,106???? .... with like $10 BB??? You say this guy is a solid top player???? What a horrible play no matter what he holds. If he has AA he won't get called often enough to make this hand as profitable as it should be. If it's KK or QQ he'll probably only get called if he's beat. And if it's anything else it's not worth the risk of a call to try to steal. This seems like a "Play Money" move you always see. Comments????
|
|
#17
05-04-2005, 04:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker as spectator sport: QQ in SB facing allin preflop.. PP 5/10 NL
Looks lke 5/10 blinds are mentioned in the title to me.
|
|
#19
05-04-2005, 04:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poker as spectator sport: QQ in SB facing allin preflop.. PP 5/10 NL
Sorry, read the text 5 times but not the heading. Still a horrible play though.
And to the other guy... ?????????????????????????
|
|
#20
05-04-2005, 04:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am I missing something here?
The blinds look like 5/10 from title of thread. As for the formatting errors, I think that's from the bisonbison hand converter for a hand that you are not in, I've run into something similar with it. As for the rest of you comments, clearly you don't play those tables very often because there are a lot of metagame moves being made amongst the regulars in those games which is presumably what was happening here. This could have been caused by something on another table, multitabling metagaming moves make for some wierd stuff.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
