|
|
#11
02-10-2005, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JJ fold
I just don't understand the PF cap. UTG seems to be a tight player and most likely is 3-betting with AA-QQ and AK. MP1 is loose but aggressive PF and here makes a very unusual call of 3-cold (AA-22???, Ax?). I can understand capping it if you're putting UTG on AK and MP1 on a smaller pair. If you're going to make this read and cap PF then don't you need to see this hand at least a round further on this board? Wouldn't you cap the flop to drive out UTG... bet the turn and fold to a raise?
|
|
#12
02-10-2005, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ fold
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What was your reasoning behing capping it PF? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] I think you're overly harsh here. [/ QUOTE ] Ya think? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
02-10-2005, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ fold
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What was your reasoning behing capping it PF? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] I think you're overly harsh here. While it is probably better to cap preflop I doubt there's much in it. I can't exactly see UTG+1 3 betting with 99. [/ QUOTE ] I can. scrub
|
|
#14
02-10-2005, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ fold
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What was your reasoning behing capping it PF? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] I think you're overly harsh here. While it is probably better to cap preflop I doubt there's much in it. I can't exactly see UTG+1 3 betting with 99. [/ QUOTE ] I can. scrub [/ QUOTE ] He'd be making a very dubious play.
|
|
#15
02-10-2005, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ fold
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What was your reasoning behing capping it PF? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] I think you're overly harsh here. While it is probably better to cap preflop I doubt there's much in it. I can't exactly see UTG+1 3 betting with 99. [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand why everybody is so scared to cap Jacks nowadays. A player like UTG+1 who I described as a 17/8 player (TAG) will almost always 3-bet AK here. with the presesnce of a loose caller behind him, this is an EASY cap. UTG+1's range of hands AK - 16 combos AA - 6 combos KK - 6 combos QQ - 6 combos JJ - 1 combo TT - 6 combos he'll also occasionally 3-bet a hand like AQ. even if he never 3-bets AQ or TT, you're still only a slitht dog against his range of hands, but the presense of a loose coldcaller gives you enough overlay to make the cap +EV.
|
|
#18
02-10-2005, 02:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ fold
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What was your reasoning behing capping it PF? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] I think you're overly harsh here. While it is probably better to cap preflop I doubt there's much in it. I can't exactly see UTG+1 3 betting with 99. [/ QUOTE ] I can. scrub [/ QUOTE ] He'd be making a very dubious play. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not saying he wouldn't be making a dubious play. I'm saying that many players in the 15, even those with decent/bordering on passive preflop stats 3-bet 99 here. scrub
|
|
#20
02-10-2005, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: JJ fold
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] What was your reasoning behing capping it PF? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] I think you're overly harsh here. While it is probably better to cap preflop I doubt there's much in it. I can't exactly see UTG+1 3 betting with 99. [/ QUOTE ] I can. scrub [/ QUOTE ] He'd be making a very dubious play. [/ QUOTE ] Furthermore "he'd be making a very dubious play" is pretty poor justification for why someone can't have a hand, even if their numbers do look approximately good. scrub
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
