|
|
#121
07-27-2005, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: suggestion for OOT
[ QUOTE ]
True, however, I know 6 other 2+2'ers in real life. They all play small stakes. Many of them play 2/4 or 3/6 and lose it at 5/10. Or the play 20+2 and lose it at a $50 SNG. They also spend a lot more time reading OOT than SS. Do you honestly think OOT hasn't helped the 5/10 players in some way? You can't have a shark if there isn't plankton and algae. [/ QUOTE ] Alright. It was fun for me to call you a troll, but the 'troll' did have some merit and I won't argue that. Also, I'm sure there's some smartass remark to be made about sample size. 
|
|
#122
07-27-2005, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: suggestion for OOT
[ QUOTE ]
but the 'troll' did have some merit and I won't argue that. [/ QUOTE ] I agree it did have some aggravation value, but only because people can't handle the truth. Also, many people in OOT inspire others to play poker. I know I got at least 60 people started in poker by hosting home games. A lot of them play online now. ugh... have work to do...
|
|
#123
07-27-2005, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: suggestion for OOT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] but the 'troll' did have some merit and I won't argue that. [/ QUOTE ] I agree it did have some aggravation value, but only because people can't handle the truth. Also, many people in OOT inspire others to play poker. I know I got at least 60 people started in poker by hosting home games. A lot of them play online now. ugh... have work to do... [/ QUOTE ] I think you misunderstood - I'm not arguing that I was right to call it a troll (I was partially right, though). I was saying I was having fun calling your post a troll, but that I do agree with you that maybe the average OOTiot isn't all that great a poker player.
|
|
#124
07-27-2005, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: suggestion for OOT
i'll moderate. seriously.
edit: oops, didn't quote. well, it was regarding the sex forum...and by moderate i meant masturbate... (and no, don't split the forum off....and yes, keep OOT around)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
