astroglide/ question for you

[Gonzoman]

Is there any way to automatically get a page on my cell phone whenever PokerHorse posts anything. I don't want to miss the chance to laugh and point.

[mrjim]

Good addition.

[bdk3clash]

It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong.

"It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man."
Jack Handy

[PokerHorse]

This post irritates me. so you are saying that playing 6 games at once and at after 291 hours making 60 an hour isnt playing a larger game? its not more stabilized its simply a larger game collectively. TIME- is a factor here. if it werent you could never make 60 an hour playing 3-6 could you, unless you play 6 games at once. if you are a losing player could you not lose 60 an hour? It's a larger game your playing no matter how you want to dissect it.

[bdk3clash]

There really should be a feature on this board that e-mails you whenever a specific poster creates a new post--I just can't get enough of PokerHorse.

The dichotomy between how right he thinks he is and how wrong he actually is makes for a very entertaining dynamic.

[razor]

Your posts irritate me.

Each freakin' hand is independant! Get over it already!!

[moondogg]

[ QUOTE ]
This post irritates me. so you are saying that playing 6 games at once and at after 291 hours making 60 an hour isnt playing a larger game? its not more stabilized its simply a larger game collectively. TIME- is a factor here. if it werent you could never make 60 an hour playing 3-6 could you, unless you play 6 games at once. if you are a losing player could you not lose 60 an hour? It's a larger game your playing no matter how you want to dissect it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, Jesus, are you dragging this sh*t up again?

I'm glad it irritates you. Irritating you is funny.

I try to not be rude to people, but you are king of the f'n trolls.

Nonetheless, I believe my post adequately and thoroughly addressed your fallacious and misguided views. If you disagree with my dissection, explain where my logic is flawed.

If you don't understand what I said because it was unclear, I will be happy to clarify it.

If you don't understand it because you just don't understand it, then perhaps you will finally realize an accept that you're the ignorant moron we all know you to be.

If you are going to just repeat the same crap that everyone here has thoroughly discredited, PLEASE go tell it to a brick wall instead of posting it here. Trust me, the wall will be FAR more impressed by your intelligence.

[PokerHorse]

here maybe this makes more sense. because you can play 350 hands an hour at 3-6 or any other level by playing 4-6 games at once, the game plays bigger than a normal ring 3-6
can you at least admit to this, or is this just too much?
How else could you make 60 an hour? It plays bigger period.
I understand all your points.
On a different note:
Bye the way, astroglide played 20-40 at paradise 2 tables with angelina. How did he do. she claims to have busted just about everyone there, except for him of course. He claims that he could win 3 bets an hour idf he made adjustments at 3-6. Such as......... ah maybe reading players???? How can you do that playing 4-6 tables. love to see it. Ive looked at the 3-6's 5-10s, 10-20s and 15-30s online, and they are tighter overall, not looser than the ring games I play in. The shear cockiness should be a red flag for anyone who is trying to make the proper decisions.
anyone who is new to this game and reading this should question the validity of the claims of these few who have nothing better to do but post here and make claims.

[razor]

[ QUOTE ]
Trust me, the wall will be FAR more impressed by your intelligence.

[/ QUOTE ]

Walls aren't that stupid.

[OrangeHeat]

Jealous eh?

Orange