Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-09-2004, 10:22 PM
Carl_William Carl_William is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CA & Ohio USA
Posts: 70
Default Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem

about 105 years
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 07-09-2004, 10:28 PM
Carl_William Carl_William is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CA & Ohio USA
Posts: 70
Default Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem

OJ's next wife. Age is a moot point -- any age....
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 07-09-2004, 10:51 PM
dogsballs dogsballs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 654
Default OT; The fastest Centegenarian.

On the topic of old folk, but OT...

A guy from S. Africa, nicknamed the blitz, just beat the world record for the 100 m "dash" by a person over 100 yrs of age (I think he's 104). He bested the previous record of 36 secs by several secs.

Unfortunately, the official clock had a power problem, so the poor old geezer has to do it again this weekend to have it verified as the official record... [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 07-10-2004, 12:07 AM
GuyOnTilt GuyOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem

Hey David,

I haven't read any other responses yet, but the first thought that came to mind (after I fully understood the question) was it would be exactly older than the 3rd oldest American ever. If the records are (arbitrarily) 119, 117, and 115, then out of everybody who lived to be 115 or older, over half of them were alive a year later. Actually, I guess upon further thought, my real guess would be approaching one year YOUNGER than the 2nd oldest ever, if that makes any sense.

If that's not at all where I'm supposed to go with this and you are in fact looking for a concrete number, my guess would be in the range of 112-115.

GoT
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 07-10-2004, 01:42 AM
dogsballs dogsballs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 654
Default Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem

[ QUOTE ]
If the records are (arbitrarily) 119, 117, and 115, then out of everybody who lived to be 115 or older, over half of them were alive a year later.

[/ QUOTE ]



GoT,

You're neglecting something. The proportion of the poulation tails off as you go older. So maybe 7 americans died at age 115, 3 died at 117 and only one at 119.

woof
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 07-10-2004, 07:20 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 172
Default Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem

The official answer- 106
Probability of dying
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 07-10-2004, 08:23 PM
Carl_William Carl_William is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CA & Ohio USA
Posts: 70
Default Re: Answer

If you have the data, it probably would be very simple to figure it out to a close degree. At first thought, I would do a binary chop on the data -- kind of like a tournament. Separate the data into age range groups and see who makes the quarter-finals, semi-finals, and then the finals(i.e., death). But you have to have the data, and then message it a little.

(Note: binary chop is a form of computer programming slang used in some schools)
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 07-14-2004, 01:50 PM
bsk1999 bsk1999 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 32
Default Actually

According to the Illustrated Life Table, the table commonly used among actuaries to calculate the expected future lifetime of a person selected at random from the general public, at age 103 your probability of survival is .50101 . So, according to the people who do this for a living, this would be the correct answer. However, there are different Mortality tables that could be used to come up with a slightly different (but similar) answer.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 07-15-2004, 04:30 PM
Toonces Toonces is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 31
Default Re: Actually

Yes, for actuaries, this is published information, though possibly out of date. My actuarial table agrees with bsk in that at age 103, your probability of dying is almost exactly 50%.

A more interesting trivia question IMO: At what age is the probability of surviving 1 more year the highest?
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 07-15-2004, 05:21 PM
Roman Roman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 384
Default Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem

78
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.