Moneymaker's persona changed a lot...

[SDA004]

Anyone else notice how much different Moneymaker's table image was last night. It seemed he was much more confident at the table and even was throwing his weight around. He no longer looked surprised when his bluffs worked. I mean its obvious why it happened, but I kind of thought Moneymaker would still have that quiet demeanor at the table. He still was quiet, but compared to his WSOP appearance he seemed much different.

[eastbay]

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else notice how much different Moneymaker's table image was last night. It seemed he was much more confident at the table and even was throwing his weight around. He no longer looked surprised when his bluffs worked. I mean its obvious why it happened, but I kind of thought Moneymaker would still have that quiet demeanor at the table. He still was quiet, but compared to his WSOP appearance he seemed much different.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very confident. And I thought he played very well, too. The guy can play.

eastbay

[JARID]

I thought he played very well. Especially considering the fact that his psuedo celeb status gets him alot of resentment from the pros. He stays real level headed about everything. I was impressed.

-Jarid

[BettnTibetn]

its time to stop saying he was a fluke, he played damn well in the WPT event...time to give the man his credit

[highlife]

well he's better than varkoni, ill give him that.

[wm r the rake]

i have to agree...he really showed no emotion on this one....he looked like he even lost some weight....way to go moneymaker!!!!

[JARID]

I agree 100%. It made me cringe when that Canadian guy commented that "he seems to get really lucky" [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
What...are you kidding me...I'm sure it was his vast poker experience and skill that got him to the final table and all, but thats a pretty lame thing to say. Everyone gets a little lucky on the way to final table I have to believe.

-Jarid

[toots]

Seems like a predictable maturation, from last year's "Gee, whiz, I'm just happy to be here for the first time" newby status, to a more seasoned player.

As far as I'm concerned, both personae were entirely appropriate given the circumstances. And, I'm glad for many reasons that he's shown both the ability to grow as a player, and play well (instead of looking like he's just catching good cards).

[mack23]

Agree 100% A lot of that has to do with the fact that he has been playing a lot more tournament poker as well. But I was stunned when he moved in for 230,000 over the top of a 50,000 bet on the flop with 46x, no pair, no draw. Great poker! [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[baggins]

agreed. I thought MM played very well on the WPT last night. In fact, he got busted when he put all his chips in with the best hand.

I liked his play particularly on the last hand. Both he and the other guy who wasn't Phil Gordon were short stacked against Gordon. The other guy moves in from the button, Gordon calls, and MM goes in w/ JJ. he clarifies with the tourney director that since he has more than the other short stack, if they both get busted this hand that MM will get 2nd place prize money. so he goes all in with his JJ.

MM has JJ. Other SS has T6 and PG has A7 (i think these are correct). MM probably thinks he has the best hand. if he sits this one out, and lets PG take down SS, then he still locks up 2nd place money, but the battle for 1st is that much harder. if he sits this hand out and SS doubles up, he might not even lock up 2nd place money, especially with the blinds and antes escalating relative to MM's short stack.

However, if he goes in here with a solid pair (and most likely the best hand) against both players, he has the chance to almost triple through and put himself in much better position to take 1st place. and if they both go out, he still locks up 2nd place money.

does anybody else have an opinion on this play?

If