#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pocket Ks vs A-high board
One of my big leaks is holding on to pocket pairs until the end, even with overcards on the board. Is this a good way to plug the leak, or do I still have more work to do?
I just sat down at the table this orbit, but it seems on the tight-ish side and mostly passive. Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (8 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. UTG folds, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 folds, CO calls, Button folds, SB folds, BB folds. Flop: (7.50 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players) </font> <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="CC3333">CO caps</font>, Hero calls, MP1 calls. I 3-bet to defend against the semi-bluff/free card play. My plan all along when I 3-bet was to A) call a cap and check/fold the turn unimproved or B) if not capped lead the turn and fold to a raise (if a brick hit). Is that a good course of action, or still too loose/fishy? Turn: (9.75 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players) </font> Hero checks, MP1 checks, <font color="CC3333">CO bets</font>, Hero folds, MP1 calls $1 (All-In). River: (11.75 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players, 1 all-in) </font> Final Pot: 11.75 BB <font color="#990066">Main Pot: 11.75 BB, between MP1 and CO.</font> > <font color="white">Pot won by MP1 (11.75 BB).</font> Results in white below: <font color="white"> MP1 shows 8h 7c (straight, jack high). CO shows As 9c (two pair, aces and nines). Outcome: MP1 wins 11.75 BB. </font> Thanks, -David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket Ks vs A-high board
I don't have a problem with this play. I think we could have some dissention about the flop 3bet, but most of that would be from knowing that CO would cap. I think he has you beat here and since it is only 1 more bet to see the turn, I would call. And contrary to some of the interesting conversation around here, no matter how big the pot is, folding UI on the turn is a good play.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket Ks vs A-high board
Hmm, I probably wouldn't have 3-bet the flop here. You asked him if he has a good hand (by leading out) and he responded by raising. I'd call see what the turn brings.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket Ks vs A-high board
I probably would've played it just about the same.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket Ks vs A-high board
[ QUOTE ]
You asked him if he has a good hand (by leading out) and he responded by raising. [/ QUOTE ] That's not quite how I saw it. He cold-called PF, but lots of people at Party do that, especially with two suited cards, so I had no reason to put him on specifically Ax. I bet out because I felt I was best, and his raise told me possibly otherwise. The cap convinced me that I was not best. I felt that if I just called the raise and checked unimproved, I could just as easily have been giving a flush draw a free shot at the river, a mistake I try to never let myself make. By giving CO the opportunity to cap, I think I get a lot more information than calling the raise. If it were a known, sophisticated opponent that could give me the stop-and-go treatment (call the 3-bet, raise the turn), then I'd probably be more apt to stop-and-go myself (call the raise, bet out the turn). I haven't seen a lot of stop-and-go sophistication on Party, but I have seen a lot of raising with draws (but never capping unless the field was HUGE). A post from a long time ago stuck in my mind (well, the content but not the specifics) the gist of which was basically "How do I defend against a possible semi-bluff". There was no definitive answer given in that thread (most said "that's why it's so powerful - the only way to be 'sure' is to take big risks on either side, by either re-raising or giving a free card"). At the time this really felt like one of those situations. |
|
|