|
|
#11
05-12-2004, 07:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The case against Harboral
In my world a link in a sig is OK. Would that be acceptable for people like al? Still, the spamming evidence is damning.
[ QUOTE ] this original poster was starting to get replies and the thread went to sh*t [/ QUOTE ] Indeed it did, now al has been flushed out can we get back on topic? Cheers. 
|
|
#13
05-13-2004, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The case against Harboral
Hey Audi back on topic here was my take on Bugsy.
I thought the software sucks. Advance button actions are backwards from buttons are on your turn, also a memory hog. All the virgin fish from Pokerschool start there the lower limit games are very loose/wild. Of course there are some resident sharks. Tough selection of games, rarely more then one game higher then 1/2. Several NL games going, maybe a half omaha8 half holdem in a lower limit. Very good tourney format. They rake preflop raises that are not called. In other words there is not a "No flop no drop" policy. Rake is a bit on the high side. This is what pissed me off......... First cashout only took 2 hours GREAT! Three days later I tried to cash out again. "We're sorry you can only cash out once a week" WTF???? Several of the regular players are especially rude and intentionally tilting I think. Did a review for Casinomeister on them on April 1st if I missed something check it out. I am not an affiliate for anyone so my reviews are my true opinions.
|
|
#14
05-13-2004, 01:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The case against Harboral
Guilty on all seven counts... one of my friends, cpar, was booted for just one, so why he still allowed to be here with SEVEN???
That's odd, I thought cpar.... spammed here for years and also told lies on behalf of the spam queen herself. I had many interactions with that guy, and can promise you that he only had his own interests at heart. To say he only spammed once is accurate, but that one piece of spam was 9 months wide and 100 cans deep. Lori
|
|
#16
05-13-2004, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The case against Harboral
|
|
#17
05-13-2004, 01:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am Guilty!
I have been warned now for being guilty of spamming the forum. Alright, I won't ever mention anything regarding this again, but exactly where in the terms and conditions does it say I can't direct someone to a web site that has reviews of poker rooms? This type of redirecting happens all the time here - although the poster can always say "Oh, I just like the site, I don't have anything to do with it". We mention Bonus Whores all the time in posts - no problem there I guess. I am sorry to have taken up so much of everybody's time with this issue, and while I understand the desire to keep the "affiliate" info out of the posts I really didn't think I was being a jerk for offering site-reviews of online poker rooms. As for Mat telling me I have one more chance - I certainly won't post in anyway that could be considered spam and will keep my post directly related to poker, but just so everybody knows ***Mat had never contacted me, and this is my first and only warning. His post makes it sound as if he has contacted me many times and I have ignored him. This is not the case.
Again, sorry for the inconvenience. AL
|
|
#19
05-13-2004, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I am Guilty!
[ QUOTE ]
We mention Bonus Whores all the time in posts - no problem there I guess. [/ QUOTE ] Nope, no problems at all. You know why? Because myself, Simon, and Homer all follow the rules. We don't mention the site (although we will respond to questions about it.) You find someone who likes your site enough to mention it in a post, you won't have any troubles either. But seven instances of spam...you deserve to be banned...you should be thanking Mat for giving you a warning instead of bitching about how his post sounded.
|
|
#20
05-13-2004, 09:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I am Guilty!
Jek,
Don't you mention the site everytime you announce a new member to the BW's team? Like when Homer or whoever else joined? I don't have a problem with this as I see it more as an honest way to tell people upfront that these posters now have a professional interest in BW. However, you do mention the website address in new posts. Perhaps you made a gaffe when you posted this. Example
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
