Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 05-05-2004, 09:48 PM
ACPlayer ACPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Foxwoods, Atlantic City, NY, Boston
Posts: 1,089
Default Re: Here we go again

So, your 'yes' is that of a politician (liar).

As long as Israel perceives that there is a need for a Jewish state -- which given Zionist paranoia is likely to be forever -- the answer is No, despite your beautiful answer of Yes (... but...). The goal is a pure Jewish state. Of course if there was to be a one state solution, you know that in a few years the Knesset would be primarily Arab as those pigs multiply like rats.

Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:12 PM
Chris Alger Chris Alger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,160
Default Re: Gaza Baby Killers

[ QUOTE ]
just counting cold-blooded premeditated murder of non-threatening civilians

[/ QUOTE ]

In other words, you think it's okay for Israel to murder civilians -- as traditionally and currently defined by law -- as long as it's not "premeditated."

That's about as flagrant an example of the double standard as I've seen.

As for your assumptions that rock-throwers are shot from distances where they can "maim and kill" the shooters or others, or the Palestinian use of human shields, why is it that you can never find any examples of this?
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:16 PM
Gamblor Gamblor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,085
Default Nice distortion (n/m)

Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:50 PM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Gaza Baby Killers

I'm not sayin those things are "OK" per se--just that they aren't in the same category as suicide bombings targeting innocents.

Collateral damage is not considered "murder" in war.

Shooting dangerous aggressors is either: murder, overuse of force, or justified--depending on the situation.

Suicide bombing however has only one purpose, and when the targets are not military or leadership targets, it clearly is murder 100%.

So you're admitting your figures rely overly heavily on collateral damage figures and rock-throwing incidents, or what? (whereas suicide bombing figures are "pure murder" figures)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.