#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Here we go again
So, your 'yes' is that of a politician (liar).
As long as Israel perceives that there is a need for a Jewish state -- which given Zionist paranoia is likely to be forever -- the answer is No, despite your beautiful answer of Yes (... but...). The goal is a pure Jewish state. Of course if there was to be a one state solution, you know that in a few years the Knesset would be primarily Arab as those pigs multiply like rats. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gaza Baby Killers
[ QUOTE ]
just counting cold-blooded premeditated murder of non-threatening civilians [/ QUOTE ] In other words, you think it's okay for Israel to murder civilians -- as traditionally and currently defined by law -- as long as it's not "premeditated." That's about as flagrant an example of the double standard as I've seen. As for your assumptions that rock-throwers are shot from distances where they can "maim and kill" the shooters or others, or the Palestinian use of human shields, why is it that you can never find any examples of this? |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Nice distortion (n/m)
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gaza Baby Killers
I'm not sayin those things are "OK" per se--just that they aren't in the same category as suicide bombings targeting innocents.
Collateral damage is not considered "murder" in war. Shooting dangerous aggressors is either: murder, overuse of force, or justified--depending on the situation. Suicide bombing however has only one purpose, and when the targets are not military or leadership targets, it clearly is murder 100%. So you're admitting your figures rely overly heavily on collateral damage figures and rock-throwing incidents, or what? (whereas suicide bombing figures are "pure murder" figures) |
|
|