Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2004, 04:56 PM
Talex Talex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 46
Default Playing against the bitty stacks.

Hey Folks,

I often find myself sitting at a table online, say .50/1 NL at UB, where the majority of the table is playing with around $25, a quarter of the max bet. There are also generally one or maybe a couple of players who have rolled over the max buy-in.

What's the best buy-in here?
What's proper general strategy?

I'm usually buying in for the max, and looking to double through the bigger stacks. I find myself playing mostly premium hands against the short stacks, with my speculative hands and monster makers reserved for when the big stacks wade in. I'm wondering though if this is the best way to handle these tables.

I guess this is the reverse of the whether short stack play is best discussions. Given that most of your opponents are short stacked, are you better off going short stacked yourself, or playing to double through the big stacks?

-Tim
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2004, 05:26 PM
gavrilo gavrilo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 442
Default Re: Playing against the bitty stacks.

Against a shortstack, I play tighter. I start mucking more non-premium pocket pairs, Axs, suited connectors because you aren't getting good implied odds.

Sometimes an occassion arises where I can use the shortstack player against a third player in the pot.

If you know the shortstack player to be the type to call all-in with say a flush draw or go all-in with a flush draw with a third player who is decent. In the right situation, you can come out betting if SS is next to act because if he calls, the third player will need a bigger hand to call, or if you act after, you can raise to force out the 3rd player when you hold a mediocre hand. Situation has to be right and you have to know the players.

If that made any sense at all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2004, 07:40 AM
Wardfish Wardfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hull, England
Posts: 71
Default Bust them out

If the table is full with a waiting list, try to bust them out and get someone with some money to sit in their place.

I find they come in 2 main categories: (1) tight-weak, or (2) 'in-for-a-penny-in-for-a-pound'.

Raise to isolate type 1, be prepared to call with something (but not much) against type 2.

With all the various stakes available on UB, there is no way anyone should be allowed to sit down with 20x the Big Blind. Its a waste of a seat.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2004, 02:30 PM
Al_Capone_Junior Al_Capone_Junior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,026
Default Re: Playing against the bitty stacks.

The bottom line is those itty bitty stackers are pathetic no-balls wimps and they deserve to be busted. Bet the exact quantity of their stack nearly every time you bet into them.

al
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.