Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2004, 04:37 PM
Diplomat Diplomat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Frozen Wasteland (Kingston, Ontario)
Posts: 1,225
Default Theoretical Question

You are playing a WSOP final event qualifier that gives seats to the top 11-finishers. There are currently 6 players on your table, and 6 players on the other table.

Your stack is currently the smallest on your table to the point where it is highly unlikely that anyone else but you will be eliminated from your table. You currently have 6200 TC, and the blinds are 750-1500.

On the other table, the big blind has a stack of 6000 TC after posting the big blind. UTG has a stack of 5000 TC. The next player is deep-stacked, as is the next player. The button has 3200 TC. The small blind is also deep-stacked.

You are on the button with XX. On the other table, UTG goes all-in and it is folded to the big blind, who is stalling, and has more time than you to make a decision, dude to your table folding to you faster.

What is the minimum hand that XX can be for you to play? Assume if you play you will go all-in, and very likely will be called, as the small blind and big blind are very deeply stacked.

-Diplomat
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2004, 04:44 PM
Mackie Mackie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 125
Default Re: Theoretical Question

What is the minimum hand that XX can be for you to play?

Two Jokers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-19-2004, 04:49 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: Theoretical Question

I'm not playing anything here. It is very likely that someone else will bust before you. You have position, and three players who will be forced to play before you. If one or two of the others double up, then you may be forced to make some moves, but until then...I'm not playing anything. This is especially true because UTG is allin on the other table. The other BB is likely waiting to see if you make a move before calling the UTG.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2004, 04:50 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: Theoretical Question

I'm folding everything but AA or KK. The short stack on the other table blinds off before I do and with his stack being half mine, he's more likely to get called when he does play.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-19-2004, 05:51 PM
Diplomat Diplomat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Frozen Wasteland (Kingston, Ontario)
Posts: 1,225
Default Re: Theoretical Question

I thought this one was pretty easy too. I folded tens, and it felt fine. I'd wonder about QQ though.

-Diplomat
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-19-2004, 10:52 PM
sawil sawil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pensylvania
Posts: 139
Default Re: Theoretical Question

Top eleven get seat ... 12 th get a big cash prize? Even if they did, if winning a seat is your goal, then you must fold every hand esp. with so many shorter stacks. Did you make it?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-19-2004, 11:00 PM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: Theoretical Question

I like Mackie's answer here, two jokers (i.e., wild cards). Even with AA, you are going to lose something like 15% of the time. On the other hand, you have 3 short stacks out of 6 at the other table, and two of them MUST play and win a hand or they will bust out before you do. I think the chances of you winning a seat by folding every hand from here on out is greater than the chances of your AA holding up, if you had AA. Thus, even AA can be folded here.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2004, 12:54 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Theoretical Question


AA should lose much less than 15%, since its unlikely you will even get a call.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2004, 01:16 AM
Diplomat Diplomat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Frozen Wasteland (Kingston, Ontario)
Posts: 1,225
Default Re: Theoretical Question

Given that my opponents have almost nothing to lose by calling (3 chances to eliminate the last player on the other table) and everything to gain (end of tournament) they should call with a wide range of hands, even if they are very sure I have a large pair.

-Diplomat
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-20-2004, 08:33 AM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: Theoretical Question

The original post said "Assume if you play you will go all-in, and very likely will be called". I went with that.

And if they truly have huge stacks, then they might call frequently, even though they probably shouldn't since there chances of winning a seat by folding every hand are pretty huge right now, given the 3 short stacks on the other table.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.