|
View Poll Results: Do you keep records? | |||
I'm a winning player who keeps records | 18 | 32.14% | |
I'm a winning player who don't keep records | 9 | 16.07% | |
I'm a losing player who keep records | 2 | 3.57% | |
I'm a losing player who don't keep records | 5 | 8.93% | |
I'm a break even player who keep records | 8 | 14.29% | |
I'm a break even player who don't keep records | 14 | 25.00% | |
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
quick POLL: Ideal field size for a multi-table tournament
Assume that there is about 5% great player, 15% good players, 30% decent players, 40% not so good 10% newbies
Also, what is the ideal tournament length (in terms of hours or days). Please state why. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
my ideal time lenth is about 5 to 7 hours
I have trouble playing my best after that
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick POLL: Ideal field size for a multi-table tournament
for me it's 101-150, based on your choices. I make the money more often, but 1st is still pretty nice for a payoff. I can outplay most of the field almost every time, as I am not likely to have a ton of great players entering the tournament, and all being around come bubble time. They don't take too long, 3-5 hours usually. That's my preference. Others will have different feelings on the matter.
al |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick POLL: Ideal field size for a multi-table tournament
The more the merrier, and the longer the better. Unless the buyin isn't big enough to justify the time spent.
I like bigger payoff coming with the bigger field, and I like having LOTS of time to play, because that means the stacks are deeper compared to the blinds, which is where I tend to do best. Thus, the WSOP championship is the the best tourney out there for me. Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick POLL: Ideal field size for a multi-table tournament
don't know why i like the 200-300 bracket the most, because as Greg said, the more the merrier. I also like the bigger payoffs and more entrants.
However, i don't usually have 6 to 8 hours to sit and play a tourney, so 200-300 allows me to play about 5 hours at most, and that's if i get down to the final four or around there. If I had unlimited free time though, I agree that longer and more entrants is better. I haven't played any Stars tourneys, but I really like the big Party Tourneys. |
|
|