Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 01-17-2004, 04:59 AM
Ted Geisel Ted Geisel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 353
Default Don\'t the terms \"bet, call, raise or fold\" ring a bell for you, Gab ?

Try looking at the history and legalization of poker in California to understand the difference between a banked game, where the house "accepts or makes wagers, and the non-banked games, like poker, where the Players are the ones making and accepting wagers .... Don't the terms "Bet, call, raise, fold" ring a bell ? Does the House utter ANY of them ??? No, the Players do. It is the Players who are making or accepting or declining wagers, not the House.

Anyway, even if you don't agree, the Fifth Circuit decision in the Mastercard Internet Gambling Litigation, already DIRECTLY said your quoted language did not cover non-sports internet gambling.

But, you won't bother to actually READ that precedent because you KNOW the answer already.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.