|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: You roll a fair die and win $1 billion dollars deposited into your bank account just for playing. If | |||
| Never take the bet |
   
|
17 | 10.49% |
| A larger number then 1 billion |
  
|
5 | 3.09% |
| Sides>1,000,000,000 |
  
|
1 | 0.62% |
| Sides>1,000,000 |
  
|
12 | 7.41% |
| Sides>100,000 |
  
|
4 | 2.47% |
| Sides>10,000 |
  
|
12 | 7.41% |
| Sides>1,000 |
|
24 | 14.81% |
| Sides>100 |
|
43 | 26.54% |
| Sides>10 |
|
27 | 16.67% |
| Sides>1 |
|
17 | 10.49% |
| Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
12-23-2005, 03:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who to start for Lamont and Edge?
Rhodes would be a bad start with Indy resting offensive starters (including O-linemen) agaisnt the Seattle starting D. Also, it's not clear what the Edge/Rhodes split will be.
|
|
#3
12-23-2005, 03:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who to start for Lamont and Edge?
Yup, I'm in a bad spot. Lewis seems like a given, but Rhodes/James is very iffy, making both bad plays. Fisher at Chi is ugly, but I don't love Houston against NE either.
Another option is Crockett, but against Denver that kinda sucks too.
|
|
#4
12-23-2005, 03:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who to start for Lamont and Edge?
JL and CH
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
