25-50 NL AA hand

[Ulysses]

lapoker,

This LRR w/ non-premium hands happens a decent amount when an aggressive late position player raises limpers. Usually you just take down the pot right there.

[Paluka]

After some chats with El Diablo it seems to me that the limp re-raise is simply too small. Why limp re-raise and still give the guy odds to bust you with a set?

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
After some chats with El Diablo it seems to me that the limp re-raise is simply too small. Why limp re-raise and still give the guy odds to bust you with a set?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hero would need to repop it to 1K-1200 to get 33 to fold.

Hero wanted action with his AA and got it.

[Paluka]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
After some chats with El Diablo it seems to me that the limp re-raise is simply too small. Why limp re-raise and still give the guy odds to bust you with a set?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hero would need to repop it to 1K-1200 to get 33 to fold.

Hero wanted action with his AA and got it.

[/ QUOTE ]

But you aren't getting "action" if the guy gets odds to flop his set and will stack you every time. You need to raise enough where he is making a mistake to call, right?

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
After some chats with El Diablo it seems to me that the limp re-raise is simply too small. Why limp re-raise and still give the guy odds to bust you with a set?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hero would need to repop it to 1K-1200 to get 33 to fold.

Hero wanted action with his AA and got it.

[/ QUOTE ]

But you aren't getting "action" if the guy gets odds to flop his set and will stack you every time. You need to raise enough where he is making a mistake to call, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

True, but you also got to consider the number of times he will make the call with an overpair/TP where you're winning.

Unless you can say he won't go to the felt unless he has 2pair/set.

i'm sure many disagree, but i would never limp-reraise with a premium pair in this spot(fairly deep stacked), even if this move is done with a variety of hands. I think stacks are too deep to reveal your hand this early. Even if you make this move with other hands, this time you actually have AA, and you are trying to represent the hand you actually have. You would have to be on pretty high levels with your opponent to limp-reraise with AA, and have the villian put you on another hand. Although this isn't interesting, I'd just make a standard raise and hope to be re-raised.

If you do limp-reraise and stacks are this deep, you are gonna to have to reraise so much, you shut out all hands that could reraise you, had you just raised in the first place. All in all, I just think you stand to win less and lose more with the l-rr.

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
i'm sure many disagree, but i would never limp-reraise with a premium pair in this spot(fairly deep stacked), even if this move is done with a variety of hands. I think stacks are too deep to reveal your hand this early. Even if you make this move with other hands, this time you actually have AA, and you are trying to represent the hand you actually have. You would have to be on pretty high levels with your opponent to limp-reraise with AA, and have the villian put you on another hand. Although this isn't interesting, I'd just make a standard raise and hope to be re-raised.

If you do limp-reraise and stacks are this deep, you are gonna to have to reraise so much, you shut out all hands that could reraise you, had you just raised in the first place. All in all, I just think you stand to win less and lose more with the l-rr.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very few people disagree with you. fslexcduck had a hand where she limp-reraised w/AA deep and everybody jumped on it.