![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. c-bet it you little girl.
2. why the limp? raiiiiise that. w/ the limp, yea just toss it. 3. Call. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
1. c-bet it you little girl. 2. why the limp? raiiiiise that. w/ the limp, yea just toss it. 3. Call. [/ QUOTE ] Seems about right. I thik the limpers open up the villains range quite a bit in hand 3. What's the buy-in? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
1. c-bet it you little girl. 2. why the limp? raiiiiise that. w/ the limp, yea just toss it. 3. Call. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah - what he said! With special emphasis on number one. You have to CBet here - everytime. I would also add - tough three hands in a row! Those are typically the hards hands to play correctly (AQ and JJ) and you got them in a row. I hope your last all in went well, and the hands got a bit easier for you after that! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lets talk about hand 1.
I'm UTG+2, and my opponent seemed on the somewhat tight side. Lets just say I was making an effort to pay attention, and I was surprised by his cc of my raise. I believe he is a thinking player, although its hard to say this early, in a tourney that has lots of juicy satelliters in it. One of the things that has been bothering me is in this situation, I whiff the flop. I put his range for CC'ing me to a pocket pair, or AQ and up. I suppose you could include some suited connectors. So, this flop was MUCH more likely to have improved his holdings than mine. A week ago, I would have auto-pushed out a bet of T100 or so. But, I've been analyzing my game, especially in the party 150's, and it seems like I'm losing alot of $$ to missed flops OOP where I continuation bet, and get called. So, I just bet 1/10th my stack, and to the turn we go, where I miss one of my 6 outs. Now what? I will agree that I should have bet the turn. Once he checked behind, I think betting out is reasonable. I think the factors that made this a GOOD candidate for no continuation bet: 1. It would essentially have to be close to 1/10th my stack. 2. I'm OOP 3. Opponent CC'd my raise, and is fairly tight. Thoughts? Nick p.s. I had enough by the third JJ hand, called the allin figuring that more times than not, I was going to be shown Ax (AJ or higher) and 77 through TT, many more times than QQ through AA. He has AK. I'm happy. Then unhappy. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
my opponent seemed on the somewhat tight side. Lets just say I was making an effort to pay attention, and I was surprised by his cc of my raise. I believe he is a thinking player, although its hard to say this early, in a tourney that has lots of juicy satelliters in it. [/ QUOTE ] That's a little more info than: [ QUOTE ] No good info on villian in this hand. [/ QUOTE ] Now I think checking is reasonable for exactly the reasons you mentioned. I also have been thinking about c-bets from OOP and whether or not they've been profitable. I haven't come to any conclusions but on a ragged flop I find that most people think I've got Ax and missed when they have a pair, so they call. Of course, this is good to know when I have an overpair or better. I think I'm going to start keeping track of c-bets and see if I can get a decent sample size that provides more info. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yah. Whoops.
I started thinking more about the hand, went back and reread the HH. And I was 3-tabling limit tables at the time. Oh, I wish I had ADD. Nick |
![]() |
|
|