#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
Unless he was being sarcastic, I have a lot (well, even more) to learn.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
[ QUOTE ]
Do you really mean this? [/ QUOTE ] Of course [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
On the bright side at .50/1 Party Poker you do not have to understand the concepts of sarcasm. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
You just described a hand that I played in just the other night, except I didn't make a straight, instead the flop blessed me with a 6 and 3 for two pair, the other person I was against showed me two Aces at the end.
One of the key points for my opponent to consider was the fact that I was in the big blind and had a "free" look at the flop. There was no raise preflop so I can only assume that he was slowplaying his aces. Had there been a raise I would have mucked my trash hand. I forget exactly how the betting went, at some point I figured my opponent might have a higher two pair (63 isn't exactly the cats meow), plus I'm in a rebuilding phase (that's why I'm in micro limit hell) so I was playing a little weak on this particular hand, although my betting did indicate I had top pair beat, so this should have been a clue. Anyway I took it down with my low two pair against his pair of aces. I kinda felt for the guy since he was short stacked to begin with, and was probably waiting for those bullets all night. I know what its like to fold hand after hand, get a great hand, only to be smacked by some offsuit trash like my 63 hand. So in my case I wasn't "intentionally" playing a bad hand, someone "allowed" me to play because they slowplayed their aces. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
Sit down at the next 2+2 table. Its filled with good players and is therefore much easier than most Party .5/1 tables filled with people who will call you down with nothing.
Ummm...I find it easier to beat bad players than good players. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
So a player of your caliber will actually do better, playing against tight players, than against loose fishies, who are practically unbeatable.
Do you really mean this? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
Yeah I agrre with ya it sucks to lose with the "best hand" pre-flop. I've lost more money with A-A than any other hand (records). Just last night I had them cracked all 3 times in a 4 hour session, lost to K-2o, 5-6o, and J6s, bet and raised and re-raised and capped and crushed. Frustrating! But I still have confidence enough to get my money in when I have the best of it! If I lose, hopefully i learn and get wiser. Win in the long run with these hands you will.....patience is key.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
All joking aside, if you really think playing against players that will go to the river with anything then I still suggest sitting at the next 2+2 table. You may or may not win anything, but when you leave you will appriciate those fish a lot more.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
To quote confucious: Eggzackree.....
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part Poker players
What's really frustrating is playing against players who don't pay you off when you have a good hand. Also, they only call and raise when they have you beat. I hate those good players. |
|
|