![]() |
|
View Poll Results: which color ? | |||
red red (lipstick rendezvous) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
45 | 48.39% |
dark red (dapple apple) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 51.61% |
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] But it's not a sequel any more than For A Few Dollars More is. The characters are different. This seems somewhat akin to calling "Snatch" a sequel to "Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels." [/ QUOTE ] It was billed as a sequel at the time. It's sold as a trilogy of all three now. If you check the various Serigo Leone fan sites they all call it "The Fist Full of Dollars" trilogy. [/ QUOTE ] I always thought of them as "the man with no name" trilogy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Usually most People would call it that, they are sequels as per the director, they took place at the same time (back drop of the civil war) in the same place [Out West] and with the same main Charcter, the man with no name. Blondie was the Nick name used by Tuco only. He never says his name , so if someone called him Joe, or Ringo or Harry it didnt matter it was names given to him by someone else he never gave his name thus, the man with no name.
He is always the "good" or perceived as Good and wearing the same outfit |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somebody is going to have to point to where Sergio Leone called these "sequels," or where he stated that Eastwood is playing the same character in all three, before I believe it. Not saying it's not true, I haven't read enough interviews with Leone. But it would surprise me. I think it's obvious from watching the movies that they are completely disconnected stories. That's all.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's close between T2 and Il Buono, Il Brutto, Il Cattivo
|
![]() |
|
|