|
|
|
|
#2
12-10-2005, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
Based on how few people have really good bb/100 over a good chunk of hands, I'd say the 100/200 game doesn't look so great. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's surprising. Is it impossible to run really good in that game? 
|
|
#3
12-10-2005, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Based on how few people have really good bb/100 over a good chunk of hands, I'd say the 100/200 game doesn't look so great. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's surprising. Is it impossible to run really good in that game? [/ QUOTE ] stevieg is at 4bb/100....sustainable? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Barron
|
|
#4
12-11-2005, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
Based on how few people have really good bb/100 over a good chunk of hands, I'd say the 100/200 game doesn't look so great. [/ QUOTE ] you'd think so, but sometimes the games are real, real good. last night jinberg, holybolty, kennyj, and pd51323515 (or whatever) were at both tables. i'd only need two of these players at the tables to sit down. PS how the hell is jinberg a winner on both of Enon's lists. he is plain awful. there's no way he should even be a winner over 10K hands. if he is a 2p2er i apologize in advance, but i doubt it.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
