|
|
|
|
#2
12-07-2005, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: odd move at the higher stakes games
I just view this as if they have pushed, and act accordingly. Actually their hands even tend to be weaker than you'd expect - often Ax where x is absolute crap.
It gets no respect from me. I very rarely do it.. I can't even remember the last time. 
|
|
#3
12-07-2005, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: odd move at the higher stakes games
[ QUOTE ]
I just view this as if they have pushed, and act accordingly. Actually their hands even tend to be weaker than you'd expect - often Ax where x is absolute crap. It gets no respect from me. I very rarely do it.. I can't even remember the last time. [/ QUOTE ] tigerite, your response is exactly as interesting to me as all the rest of them. at some point i'll go through them all. you "view it as if they have pushed and act accordingly" but it "gets no respect from you." the hands are "weaker than i'd expect - often Ax ..." but you treat it like they've pushed and act accordingly. these things don't add up. either it has more folding equity or not against you. either you treat it exactly like a push or not. more importantly, if you think that they do it with crap, shouldn't you be continuing with more hands than you would against a push? if it's an effective way of making people fold more, why wouldn't you do it yourself? c
|
|
#4
12-07-2005, 04:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: odd move at the higher stakes games
Ok, I mean that I don't respect it any more than if they had pushed. i.e. if their stack is in the desperation range, and I think they are capable of a push with a relatively weak hand, that I am ahead of (say with AJs, or some mid-to-high pair, or whatever) I'm moving in on them. Maybe there is one odd very rare occasion here and there where I might, just might, consider a raise like this different from if he had moved all-in in the first place. The increase in FE it gains from me is negligible.
|
|
#5
12-07-2005, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: odd move at the higher stakes games
But I don't think I've often seen people do this move with more hands than I'd have expected them to open push with; so I don't reckon it would be viewed as necessarily weaker than open pushing. There are exceptions to this too of course - like if it's a LAG donk or something, well, his raise gets very little respect from me anyway, and he probably hasn't even considered his stack size etc.
|
|
#6
12-07-2005, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: odd move at the higher stakes games
1) do you think that this gets them more FE than a push?
2) do you think that this gets them more action than a push? 3) do you do this? 1) I think a raise that is not all-in gets more FE from solid players who know that you are solid, and less FE from bad/average players who don't know about pushbottting. At least that is what I think, because they'll have to call of less of their stack. Solid players will be confused about why you didn't push. 2) It might get more action if there are bad players left to act. See 1. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] 3) I never do this. I do raise 2-3BB in stead of pushing with high blinds with monsters VS people who would call this and not a push. I never raise 6bb in stead of pushing. Maybe I'll experiment with it on a tight table. (btw, these threads have some influence on the play in higher stakes games I think. It could be my imagination, but at the $55's after there was a thread where several players said they will call with any ace and low pairs when a pushbotter pushes in to them, I got called with crap all the time by the 2+2-ish players. Meh. )
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
