|
|
|
|
#1
12-06-2005, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dumbest home game rule ever?
[ QUOTE ]
I played a Home Game with no side pots. If you were all-in for your last 100 when the blinds were 1,000-2,000 you could win the full pot of 3,100. You could also win any additional betting the other players made. Needless to say I only played once. [/ QUOTE ] Dumbest. Rule. EVAR. 
|
|
#2
12-06-2005, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dumbest home game rule ever?
I'll be honest, I don't know which rule is worse.
6 Hands Heads up. Ability to win full pot if you have 1 small denom chip left. That is...tough... I feel like an idiot for griping about some of the home game rules I've ran into...
|
|
#4
12-12-2005, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dumbest home game rule ever?
I played in a limit game where you had to "bet the raise". Every hand starts out as a $0.25-$2 bet. If you raise, that raises the lower limit of the spread, until you got above $2, at which point it's fixed limit.
As an example. I raise preflop to $1 and get 4 callers. I bet $1 on the flop and there's a raise to $3. Now my options are to call $3 or raise to $6. If I raise and get called, I can only check or bet $6 on the next round. Here's the kicker: you could not check-raise or sandbag (call then raise on the same round).
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
