#1
|
|||
|
|||
So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
No it's not me. And yes I'm aware some people keep more than that online. But still sick. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
i'm not sure what you're talking about. that's only 604732BB.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
Did you try going 40,000 bets with him on the turn? I am fairly sure this would cause interpoker to 'splode.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
Perhaps he ran bad and decided to move down a few notches, to rebuild bankroll and confidence. No shame in that.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
That would be way more impressive if it was a no limit table.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
LOL ... yes after buying in with the max 100$ on a 0.5/1$ NL table he is now up 300.000 times the big blind
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
Looks like Stox is running good at .25/.50 too.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
I think that qualifies as a brag, so the (low content) tag isn't needed.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
Oh, I thought this was about how half the table is only sitting with 10BB.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So Sick {Low content... is that possible in this forum?}
|
|
|