#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cold Call PF - is it ever good?
You would be much closer (but not entirely correct) to say that it is wrong to cold call FIRST IN after a raise. Even then there are situations to cold call with (a pocket pair at a table that is going to go six to the flop even with the raise) for example.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cold Call PF - is it ever good?
To clarify, I was trying to think of an example where I would just call first to act after a raiser. The more cold callers there are between me and the initial raiser, the more I will call with. (Both my odds and my relative position improve.) At some point I don't even think of it as cold calling.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cold Call PF - is it ever good?
[ QUOTE ]
I was trying to think of an example where I would just call first to act after a raiser. [/ QUOTE ] Loose/passive table, with several VPIP >40 players left to act behind you and a 70/3 player in the BB. UTG+1, a reasonable TAG, opens. You see JTs in UTG+2. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cold Call PF - is it ever good?
Q9s in the sb after 6 limpers and a button raise, cold calling then hitting your straight is like heaven.
|
|
|