|
|
|
|
#1
12-04-2005, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
I hate the way Mike Sexton just assumes whatever he does is always right (as in, raising every A high hu) and then criticizes players for not doing it.
And he's incredibly results oriented. 
|
|
#2
12-04-2005, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
[ QUOTE ]
And he's incredibly results oriented. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#3
12-04-2005, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
I only hate Mike when he questions a good poker play. Either he's playing dumb for the audience or he just isn't very good. I hate VVP with a passion because he knows absolutely nothing. If he calls 44 a monster or a "real hand" ever again I will have him killed.
|
|
#4
12-04-2005, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
Guy pushes with something like an open ended straight draw.
Mike: "and that's a semi bluff at best!" Yes, because some of the time even if he gets called and hits his draw, he might get hit by a meteor and lose the pot. Only in a BEST CASE SCENARIO does it qualify as a semi bluff.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
