Compare three bubble situations...

[EnderIII]

Question says lowest hand i could have, doesn't mean I'll always push with these hands, but...

1st hand 54s

2nd hand not even aces, pushing not in best interest, want to extend bubble not end it as chipleader, so don't discourage action by pushing with good hands and fold weak hands

3rd hand i'd almost push with one card here....so any two will do

[splashpot]

[ QUOTE ]
2nd hand not even aces, pushing not in best interest, want to extend bubble not end it as chipleader, so don't discourage action by pushing with good hands and fold weak hands

[/ QUOTE ]
If you don't play, SB obviously will. So folding aces will not necesarrily extend the bubble. Folding aces is clearly wrong.

[Freudian]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
2nd hand not even aces, pushing not in best interest, want to extend bubble not end it as chipleader, so don't discourage action by pushing with good hands and fold weak hands

[/ QUOTE ]
If you don't play, SB obviously will. So folding aces will not necesarrily extend the bubble. Folding aces is clearly wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

And if SB is the timid type, I don't mind calling with decent cards here. At the lower limits many players are really horny to get ITM, even when they have a giant stack and could push you away with any two here, so they will just complete and BB pretty much always gets his money in here. Check down to the river and everyone lives happily ever after.

[EnderIII]

Just because i advised not to push with aces does not in anyway imply that i think it would be proper to fold aces. Consider...gasp...raising less than pushing all in...or even limping to encourage action from other stacks. The negation of pushing is not folding...this is a ridiculous interpretation of my post.