#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
So xorbie, have you, AZK and Mat discussed this? I assume you will mod the mid and a mod needs to found for low. If this is going to happen, then you should strike while the iron is hot.........
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[i]If you split the forums, SSNL would lose a lot of good advice. -Poker Fink Why, there are plenty of good 100max players, and I bet the likes of Xorbie and TWP would still reply to interesting posts. I think it needs to be done. 25-100nl is very different than 200-1000nl [/ QUOTE ] Its not like small stakes players won't be able to read the mid stakes forum if they want to. I have been playing small stakes for quite a while and am presently in transition to mid stakes. I have been reading the mid high forum almost exclusively for several months now. I think the small stakes forum is way overcrowded. I think that mid stakes players would post more if there was a seperate forum. This would provide small stakes players with more opportunities to learn by reading and reviewing mid stakes threads. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't think many mid-posters would post in small if it got up and running nicely, which probably has both a good and a bad side to it. [/ QUOTE ] And quoting myself... [ QUOTE ] If you split the forums, SSNL would lose a lot of good advice. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] A bridge is needed between small and high stakes. I don't feel like one exists now. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
NL100 would still be in small stakes. IMO, you have to be decent to win at that level. Winning at NL100 suggests a certain level of competence. I've been finding NL100 and NL200 real similar. IMO, NL25 and NL50 are real similar and then there's a jump up to NL100 and then a mini-jump up to NL200. And then there's probably another significant step to go higher than NL200. Mid's aren't served by the nitiques of the smalls nor the belittlement of the bigs.
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
4_2: Thanks! Me too! beavens: Nah, I was just being a sarcastic bastard. And slyly pointing out the fact that some mid limit players post really crap advice. [/ QUOTE ] f u |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
i guess we need to clarify sarcasm, so, *"i [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] u twp"
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
I love you, too, dude. But I'm curious why you are less than 3 calling?
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
"i [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] twp" [/ QUOTE ] That would make an interesting title change, eh "Coach"? |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
us 2/4 players need the split to have a home. We'd still post in sshl to help players who are learning out. And im sure some hsnl would post in msnl to help us out.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
I love you, too, dude. But I'm curious why you are less than 3 calling? [/ QUOTE ] cause [insert witty reply] |
|
|