|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
[ QUOTE ]
Because you'd be happy if your opponent folded, allowing you to profit while holding a weak hand. 89o is only profitable as a drawing hand if there are a lot of people to see the flop with you to potentially pay you off on the few times that you actually make a strong hand. [/ QUOTE ] He's a 3:1 favorite with his overcards. He doesn't want to scare his opponent away. [ QUOTE ] No. Realize that if you do get your flush with four of one suit on the board, you will scare your opponent unless s/he also has a flush, which might beat you. [/ QUOTE ] When was the last time you lost with a flush? This is bad advice, flushes are money-making hands. I looked at pokertracker, its says I'm way positive for flushes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
his draw is a 3:1 favorite...but not his chances of winning. Have you ever read any poker literature? The ideas of outs and pot odds are everywhere in them. you're obviously confusing something...stop calling names, stop trying to prove the world wrong...just relax and dialog with people in a calm manner. If this is how you interact with people in the real world I wouldn't be suprised to find that you have no real friends. pretty lonely world you live in
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
[ QUOTE ]
his draw is a 3:1 favorite...but not his chances of winning. Have you ever read any poker literature? The ideas of outs and pot odds are everywhere in them. you're obviously confusing something...stop calling names, stop trying to prove the world wrong...just relax and dialog with people in a calm manner. If this is how you interact with people in the real world I wouldn't be suprised to find that you have no real friends. pretty lonely world you live in [/ QUOTE ] I'm sick and tired of misinformation like this being spread on this forum. I don't know what poker books you've been reading, but they are clearly horrible. The concept that jman refers to is clearly illustrated in: I suggest you read this book before giving others terrible advice. Make sure to pay careful attention to chapters 3, 5, and 8, as they are the most relevant to the concepts georgiec and jman have presented in this thread. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
lol, bravo
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
i think that post you replied to with "lol, bravo" was meant to demean you, i hope you caught wind of that
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
[ QUOTE ]
i think that post you replied to with "lol, bravo" was meant to demean you, i hope you caught wind of that [/ QUOTE ] I wasn't intending to demean him. He obviously has serious leaks in his game. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
The trolling half of this thread is now worth its existence.
hilarious post!. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
harding: needs to learn math
lotus: needs to learn to swim, his game has so many leaks that he may soon drown otherwise jman:.....good guy, i would let him date my sister tehmatt: are you perhaps an accountant? i could use one avis: get a new pic, the matrix wasnt cool after 02, and also see advice for harding. souldaddy: i am indifferent to you, but i am a huge robert goulet fan, so your ok with me... and harding quit calling me a damn troll!!!!!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
"and harding quit calling me a damn troll!!!!!! "
jman is the troll. you actually seem confused. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb people and their dumb pocket pairs
not "confused" harding, more like "bicurious" but hey anytime you want to play, i am more than down. you can find me on AP under this same handle
|
|
|