![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And USC is second most over-rated...This is kinda stupid.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is it stupid? They were very overrated preseason in the late 90s.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think TSC summed it up well. Pre-season ranking as stupid way to judge anything. It just favors small schools and punishs large ones.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I think TSC summed it up well. Pre-season ranking as stupid way to judge anything. It just favors small schools and punishs large ones. [/ QUOTE ] I know you're not saying preseason rankings FAVOR small schools. I know you're not. You must be saying that because the preseason rankings are so heavily-biased AGAINST small schools, this chart will tend to give more weight to the underrated nature of small schools. That's what you're saying, right? Please don't tell me that the TCU's, Fresno State's, Utah's, Boise's, and Tulane's of this world have been HELPED by the preseason rankings in comparison with their level of talent. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct I write like a 5 year old.
Look at a school like Utah on that chart. IIRC they are not ranked in the preseason once, so if they jump to top 15 out of the blue it is a lot of points for that chart. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lol - gotcha
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
And USC is second most over-rated...This is kinda stupid. [/ QUOTE ] 1989 is when this chart starts....just because USC is good now doesn't mean they weren't overrated until 3 years ago. And i agree that you would need the preseason rankings from 1-117 for this to be effective. You can't just lump all unranked teams as 26th but an interesting chart anyways. |
![]() |
|
|