![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Leaderboard in some cases can mean very little
I am top 40 on the leaderboard. But here is an example of my results from today 53 (50+5) SNG's 1st 2nd 3rd 6 4 7 Down - $115 on the day I will still get close to 700-800 points The party leaderboard favours high volume players - over winning and more skillful players. Either way - high volume is positvely correlated with winning otherwise you would go broke.. So shoot for the top -Cheers ClockWyze [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, that's what I was trying to say... well illustrated.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the fact that party gives out a decent amount of money for the top 5 is a good motivator. $5,000 for 1st thats a nice monthly income boost.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The Leaderboard in some cases can mean very little I am top 40 on the leaderboard. But here is an example of my results from today 53 (50+5) SNG's 1st 2nd 3rd 6 4 7 Down - $115 on the day I will still get close to 700-800 points The party leaderboard favours high volume players - over winning and more skillful players. Either way - high volume is positvely correlated with winning otherwise you would go broke.. So shoot for the top -Cheers ClockWyze [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] yup, pretty much. You could easily make #1 on the leaderboard by playing 100 20+2s every day for the month. In fact, a lot of the top people on the leaderboard ARE just 10-tabling the 22s/33s for 8 hours every day. the thing is that the # of points you earn is actually logarithmic in relation to the buy-in, not linear. so you make like twice* the # of points for a 1st in a $1065 compared to a 1st in a $22. *not sure exactly, but you get the picture. |
![]() |
|
|